[–]26062976?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
I think you're the one who needs to re-read. His (let's be real, we're on voat, probably his) "sarcasm" was in favor of the tax cut, claiming that it benefitted the bottom 10% the most, which is objectively incorrect.
[–] 26062976? ago
I think you're the one who needs to re-read. His (let's be real, we're on voat, probably his) "sarcasm" was in favor of the tax cut, claiming that it benefitted the bottom 10% the most, which is objectively incorrect.