[–] 26033644? ago 

And also what you are saying is that no innocent person ever gets arrested, goes to trial or jail?

Is that how you say the legal system works?

Because, like you say, if the (((legal))) system needs proof of someone being guilty before they can fucking arrest someone, then there obviously are no innocent people in jail, right?

And cops don't arrest people on hunches, right?

And that "hold for 48/72 hours" rule doesn't exist, right? Where the fucking pigs can arrest someone under suspicion and then create charges that stick within 72 hours, right?

How about that navy sailor that got sentenced to prison ( probably a plea deal, and I think it was a Trump pardon) for 6 "confidential" photos on a thrown away cell phone, while fucking Hiltery got off without any penalty for mishandling thousands of TOP SECRET documents on her own server.

You are telling me there isn't any case against Hitlery? None at all? When precedent suggests that mishandling classified info - under fucking obama, no less - is punishable with prison?

Shut up with your "rules for thee, not for me" bullshit, and cite some fucking facts.

[–] 26033940? ago 

You need to learn how to read.

The police don't create or file charges.

You're reading your emotions and bias into what I'm saying and it's super obvious. Broad inferences aren't a good way to make arguments. It's basically a strawman at this point.

[–] 26033966? ago 

Same with you.
Your arguments lack substance at all.
"you don't know" "you don't understand" and now "emotions"

OMFG. LOL

You suck at debate.

Counter a single one of my arguments with something substantial.

[–] 26032816? ago 

That's because of the fucking jews getting their tentacles in it.

Every goddam traitor in congress is a fucking jew or lawyer, or both.

Present your side. Don't just say "you don't know"

TEACH you motherfucker.