[–] Christosgnosis 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
well, supposedly (based on precedence) if POTUS goes with a nominee to SCOTUS from the Senate then can forego all the tedious confirmation hearings and just go straight to a Senate vote on the nominee
[–] Leveraction 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This needs to be repeated over and over and over!!!!
[–] Bushtaco321 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Not to shit on the parade but Ruth voted against citizens united. That was a good vote in my opinion. Does anyone have any examples of the positive votes she cast. Maybe direct me to a website that breaks it down. Everything I have read on here is con dam nation of her. Maybe there was some positives? Or maybe I should shut my goat mouth?
[–] BarbaricHamSammy ago
Unless they’ve already got someone that was already vetted through a confirmation process....like Coney-Barret?
[–] Yunoichi 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Claim it's in her honor for extra salt