[–] the_magic_man ago
Your links are about people starting fires. None mention Antifa. Dumbass, and of course the retards suck it up.
[–] Nosferatjew [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
And who exactly do you think is starting all these fires? The Proud Boys? lol
[–] the_magic_man ago
Well, definitely not Antifa because none of your links mention it. Unless all your sources are in on the conspiracy to hide it
[–] olinneserpona 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
The first article mentions antifa once:
“One thing I can say is that the rumor it was set by Antifa is 100% false information,” the police chief said by email. “We have some leads, and none of it points in that direction.”
It literally says antifa is not to blame, yet you claim the article says the complete opposite.
Your second article doesn't mention antifa at all and I am going to assume the rest of them doesn't either.
You don't have 22 sources saying otherwise, you have 21 not mentioning shit and one saying it definitely isn't antifa, for fucks sake.
I hate snopes as much as everyone else, but misinforming like this or plain out lying is what fucking liars do. Of course it's antifa is behind these fires, but you do not have 22 sources saying so.
You can call me a racist, you can call me white supremacist, but you can't call me a liar.
Not being liars is one of the few things dissident people have going for them, it's what separates them from the Jews and the left, please don't ruin it by lying.
[–] Nosferatjew [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This post was made to provide evidence of arson, the perpetrators of which are obvious. All those articles and videos and such help to substantiate the claims that these fires are the result of arson. Unless you are an absolute slushbrain retard, it shouldn't be very hard to connect the dots between these arson caused forest fires and the nation's leaders in arson, who go, and have gone by many different synonymous names: antifa, BLM, communists, anarchists, bolsheviks, the resistance, etc. Just because an article doesn't connect those dots directly to antifa specifically, doesn't mean those dots aren't connected. So, frankly, I don't really give a shit if some of the articles or videos don't mention antifa directly, or even say that it wasn't antifa, because anyone with half a functioning brain and any awareness at all, should be able to put the pieces together.
[–] olinneserpona ago
This post was made to provide evidence of arson,
No, it was made to pretend there is solid proof of who the arsonist is. The header is very clear on this.
Just because an article doesn't connect those dots directly to antifa specifically,
Not one, ALL OF THEM.
So, frankly, I don't really give a shit if some of the articles or videos don't mention antifa directly, or even say that it wasn't antifa, because anyone with half a functioning brain and any awareness at all, should be able to put the pieces together.
Judging by all you've written it's not hard to see you give jack shit about the truth so posts like this should be right up your alley.
[–] Optional_Reading ago
I hope the militia can take out antifa before antifa burns any more shit down
[–] thebearfromstartrack ago (edited ago)
I heard there was nothing happening where the buffalo squirm when you're trying to change them into their bathing suits.
[–] bonghits4jeebus ago
It wasn't Antifa. It was BLM. - Snopes, probably
[–] SexMachine ago
I don't understand the goal here though. Can someone explain?