[–] ElementalPee 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
It might be true. I live in a small northern California town (I know, eww. I'm planning my escape.) and their protest was a bunch of hippie nerds holding up signs in front of the courthouse for an afternoon. There's probably more retarded crap like that than there are big city issues, in terms of counting things. But that's a dumb way to look at it. Those cities are disasters and the problem needs to be acknowledged and dealt with. No one cares about some retards holding signs. How do those people think they can erase all the violence and destruction that is actually happening by pointing at something no one was complaining about as if they are the same sort of thing.
[–] anoncastillo ago
I mean, 7% of protests happening daily in many cities across the country and around the world is still a lot of violent acts.
[–] 2Smedleys_butler ago
Seen 93 thrown around elsewhere recently. Could be a Crowley connection
[–] glenny 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
BLM "protests" are still more than a thousand times more violent than any gun rights protest. They are more than six million times more violent than any anti-lockdown protest. If you look over just the last six months and compare it to any other protest movement over the same time window, I bet BLM has caused more deaths, violence, and property damage than any other. Just because every place that some morons get together to shout BLM doesn't result in violence, doesn't mean that BLM isn't incredibly violent and destructive.