[–] Fact_Checking_Alien ago (edited ago)
So Nazi's are openly seeking to use their speech to oppress, in a real non-SJW sense, people based on race. Something we all know is a wrong thing to do, because we know history and why it's bad. You, on the other hand, are not invited because you're of no importance relative to these people.
Explain to me how either of these two apply to the speaker who is not a Nazi, and who is not you? Lets skip your answer because it'll just directly go to: Explain to me again why you think this isn't a problem?
[–] KhuanZi ago
This is true, but it's not what I said the reason for not letting them speak was. See, you already had an answer in mind, so much so that you didn't read mine.
Again:
What is appropriate for something like a commencement changes. Things that would have been fine 50 years ago are unacceptable now, and vice versa. That's not censorship nor is it a bad thing per se. I don't even always agree with what's acceptable, but it's the least of any issue of free speech out there.
[–] Fact_Checking_Alien ago
Again, what about this speaker is 50 years ago? What about this speaker is a Nazi? What about this speaker is unacceptable? What about this speaker is in any way comparable to, in their minds, the hyperbole you've given? In what fashion could this speaker possibly even be anything but the minor inconvenience of being disagreed with?
So tell me, and I ask you for the third time, why you don't find this a serious social dilemma?