[–] Niggertown 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Get all white employees to collectively quit and short the stock. Buy the company shares back on the cheap, clear the Board of Directors and rehire former employees.
[–] Paranoiaattack 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Be sure you know your state laws on recording people and whether or not they have to be notified. Here in Oregon you have to notify the other person.
[–] NakedWarrior 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I'm not a lawyer but work in the legal field (some employment law). I didn't see this in the comments, if it was there, forgive me. But did YOU video the meeting? If you did, does your video include audio? If so, and since I don't know what state you live in, make sure your state laws allow for one party video/audio recording. For instance, in my state it is illegal to record both video and audio without the knowledge/permission of both parties. You can only legally record video, but no audio without the knowledge of the other person. If this is the same in your state, you actually broke the law if you were the only person who knew you were recording. Not trying to discourage you, but just want to make sure you are legally safe. Otherwise, not only could you get in legal trouble, but anything you recorded would likely not be admitted in a lawsuit.
Since you are already employed, I don't see how you could file any type of lawsuit, as you are not being discriminated against (in any lawsuit you have to show damages). If you had someone apply and not get hired, it would still be very hard to prove your company didn't hire them due to their race, but that person could try. Even if your company has millions to throw at a lawsuit (I don't know how well known or how big your company is), no company wants to go to trial and be at the mercy of a jury. At the very least, your company would likely settle with that person. However, unless your company is constantly hiring and you have friends that are perfect for jobs there, it seems like a hard task. It might be more ideal to just expose your company for what they are doing. If the proof is out there, future potential recruits can find it and sue if they so desire. However, this also allows the company to reformulate a plan to still hire non-whites but be more deviant.
[–] 13445123751 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I am not a lawyer but I think it would be in the public interest to leak this to a sympathetic mainstream press such as Fox News or Breitbart and it would be in your interest to find another job as soon as possible. If they only hire niggers than surely all the promotions are going to go to them and you and all your white colleagues will have to work more and more to make up for the loss of productivity caused by the unqualified niggers. If all the white men working there leave, they'll most likely go bankrupt which is what they deserve.
[–] ParsedOutput 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Not a lawyer, but if you ever need help with your laptop, feel free to give me a shout.
[–] Heebro 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
For a lawsuit, you need to prove harm.
Since you already work there, you would need to be passed over for a promotion by a POC, in order for you to act.
Until then, you haven't, personally, been harmed.
If you had a list of qualified applicants who applied for the job, but were ignored because they were white, then you could send this evidence to them so they could sue. You would, of course, get no money from this.
Alternatively, you could sit on it, wait until they hire a person of color, then post the evidence on the craigslist jobs section in your area for anyone who applied there that was white. Then, they could sue your company. You would, of course, get nothing in this case.
If you are trying to make money for yourself, then this is what you do.
You say nothing.
Then, you slowly build a case of harassing behavior against you because you are white. You use the evidence you have to corroborate your claims. In this case, you could make money. However, you will need a clever lawyer and you, yourself, will need to be clever in order to pull this off for maximum effect. Getting fired, after you are harassed, then being replaced with a POC would be the maximally profitable outcome.
If you just leak the information, wait until about half way through October. Give it to every news outlet.
[–] obvious-throwaway- 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Seriously, but make sure it's not a kike lawyer, although they would sell their own children for a shekel and would probably take the case as well.
[–] Derpfroot 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I don't understand. Diversity is a strength. You don't want outsiders forced on your company?
Hasn't anti-white hiring been legal since affirmative action?
[–] 25432109? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
not outright refusal to hire. Definitely AA allows for racial preferences in the case of reasonably similar candidates.
[–] Derpfroot ago
The way she worded it gave her an out: "we will be pausing the hiring of non POC until we find applicants who fit the racial mix."
That's not outright refusal.