But if they didn’t list 5 and ONLY listed covid (6%), how can we assume anything else? Can’t we only assume that it’s the full 6% based on this data?? Asking for clarification....
[–]25394155?0 points
9 points
9 points
(+9|-0)
ago
6% died of covid (or some flu they are calling covid) for sure, since it’s the only thing listed. But if, say 40% had covid listed first (leading cause of death), even though, say, two other things were listed as co-morbidity, then I think they would say those are valid covid deaths. But they aren’t giving that info (hmmm). If covid is listed second, third, fourth and so on, then it probably shouldn’t be included. (i.e. guy died from a heart attack but also tested positive for covid. Don’t even get me started on the testing.)
All I’m saying is that CDC has always recorded this way and it isn’t particularly nefarious. What is nefarious is not giving the percentage with covid as the leading cause. And MSM running around repeating the big number and fudging it and so on.
[–] 25394155? 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
6% died of covid (or some flu they are calling covid) for sure, since it’s the only thing listed. But if, say 40% had covid listed first (leading cause of death), even though, say, two other things were listed as co-morbidity, then I think they would say those are valid covid deaths. But they aren’t giving that info (hmmm). If covid is listed second, third, fourth and so on, then it probably shouldn’t be included. (i.e. guy died from a heart attack but also tested positive for covid. Don’t even get me started on the testing.)
All I’m saying is that CDC has always recorded this way and it isn’t particularly nefarious. What is nefarious is not giving the percentage with covid as the leading cause. And MSM running around repeating the big number and fudging it and so on.
[–] 25394673? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Shouldn’t all that matter be the total death count for all deaths year over year. Wouldn’t that show the impact of the pandemic?