0
0

[–] 25371086? ago 

It indicates that the mod has an opinion about insulating the Q movement against charges of vigilantism. It’s an opinion. The kids actions may or may not be defensible in court, time will tell. Yes we saw the footage of him defending himself. Putting himself out there was a risk to himself, and there is a real legal question up for debate right now about his actions.

0
0

[–] 25373634? [S] ago 

you are actually on the opposite side of a NYT piece that did a break-down of the incident and they're finding is that Kyle was aggressed on first (even with shots being fired first by someone else besides Kyle) and it looks entirely like self-defense. The NYT has practically already done the legal team's entire defense for of Kyle for them (imagine that)

now think of what it means for the NYT - of all newspapers - to take the side of Kyle in this and yet there are QRV faggots that are ready to see the DA hang Kyle because they can see right off how convincing the DA case against Kyle is

Anyone that has posted against Kyle is most definitely a subversive enemy of the republic - because they immediately took the side of the enemy's propaganda narrative. Very black and white situation (a real patriot never knee-jerk reacts to a situation by siding with the enemy's narrative)

This is a great new litmus test to see the infiltration that has occurred

0
0

[–] 25371587? ago 

Not a compromise of the site. Just your shitty subverse.