Re: the 12,000 year cycle.
Our ancestors, the survivors, are the ones that crawled out of the caves.
The ones in the cities and towns and fields were not so fortunate.
Don't go thinking we're immune just because 'our ancient ancestors DNA that's been diluted for 500+ generations.. '
[–] 25356463? [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
We do generally get help but, yes, in the past we have lost a lot of people. About 70k years ago, everyone was done with us and we may have received nearly no help. The human population under those circumstances dipped to 12000 which we can see in our own DNA. Losing people is no longer necessary. I believe that I can see that we have enough time to do what we need to do as long as we can keep gaining consciousness. We might not need rescue. We might be able to manage things ourselves with perhaps a little advice and a lot of encouraging onlookers. Most civilizations on planets that are so effected by passing through the galactic current sheet are not surface-dwellers... probably. Those cabal people have learned a ton about tunnelling and underground construction. Hello, Cabal, the spraying isn't going to help one bit. Cut it out.
It is well within our grasp to discern what's likely to happen and to account for it well. For example, perhaps do not build your castle on the west coast unless you mean for it to be ephemeral.
There is warning enough if you are in a field but you have to have somewhere to go that works for a month or two. Maybe an ark. And then you need a spirit of adventure and collaboration. Some tunnels and underground shelters were probably built right after an event in anticipation of the next one. But 12000 is a long time to remember. And we have a shortage of respect for those who have gone before us for the sake of learning.
[–] 25348445? [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The good and evil part is real, too. But the currency manipulation is a huge piece of it, possibly one or two steps removed from the actual end game. Tomorrow, Powell seals his fate. Friday, POTUS hamstrings the cabal.
[–] 25348564? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The 1-for-1 exchange is the safety net and our dollars in cash and those in savings/checking are okay? Getting ready to watch Ms. Zang’s video.
[–] 25348964? [S] 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Think of this like a move to a new country. Besides moving your possessions, you want to move your money. What do you do? You leave some of it in your bank just to get you to the new place, a generous amount for operating so you don't mind surprises and opportunities. But you put most of it that you feel you can afford to into a form that is recognized in the new place. In order to be responsible to you as an individual, I have to say no. Your savings (as opposed to your operating money) is not as safe in a bank as it would be in real, physical gold and silver safely within your reach. However, if everyone followed my advice, it wouldn't work. There isn't enough gold and silver for that. So you and I have to set aside our individual concerns for a moment and think at POTUS' level.
He cannot evacuate us all into gold. OK. Maybe he can. I mean I have no idea how he could offer us gold for our dollars. There would have to have been several asteroids of gold mined completely in order for their to be anything like a reasonable amount of gold to account, even at today's prices, for all the dollars that even ordinary people, companies and non-Soros rich people who don't go to Epstein Island have together counted collectively.
It's like if we wanted to make a new currency out of cowrie shells. Even if you estimate the most modest amount of cowrie shells (which don't hold value), there just aren't enough. However, if someone in your town secretly located a stash of ungodly amounts of cowrie shells, what would a good village leader do? She or he or Whatnot would have everyone turn in their shells for something else, something more reliably limited in quantity or number. So when the person who found the stash came for his/her/whatnot exchange, the cheater makes out a little but not a tonne. If the cheater brings in armfuls, the gig is up.
POTUS could wait until gold and silver are worth larger numbers of dollars and try to offer a gold backed dollar. Many people predict that this is the plan. But there is a problem with the plan. If the cabal have stupid orders of magnitude more dollars than the whole earth combined (and they do), they will show up and buy the gold. That doesn't sound good to me.
Another thing about moving to a new country (or letting the USA become the nation it is meant to be) is that the costs and expenses of the change over are expected to be high but what really matters isn't how bad it gets for a little while. What matters is have we made the right move? Is this new situation a solid, reliable improvement? If it is, we can surely put up with quite a lot during the transition.
That's the more general answer to your question. Since it doesn't seem to me to be possible for us all to run up our credit cards to buy gold and silver because, unless there is something unexpected, there isn't enough metal to serve us, I say a qualified yes to your question at the broadest level. Commercial banks are not nice but what makes them evil is their ability to cheat you and their ability to get as much money as they want for nearly-free from the Federal Reserve. With the return of good laws and enforcement and with the removal of the insane and ridiculous and certainly unwarranted privilege of the Fed to charge us interest on our own money because we are too stupid to handle it ourselves, even if there is a problem for a while during a transition, it will be ok.
POTUS can regulate the commercial banks. The small ones can be absolutely lovely in a new context. POTUS can adapt the SWIFT codes and the already number one most reliable way of sending money around the world (unless it is a small amount of money): wire transfer. POTUS can adapt wire transfer into instantaneous reliable global transaction settlement in any currency with the US Courts, some of the best in the world, as the arbiters of problems with fair, transparent due process.
But if you can take cash out that you don't need immediately, that's a good plan even if you don't buy silver.