0
0

[–] geovoat [S] ago 

"The division of society is perfectly easy, according to the estimate of human nature made in these documents. It is human nature to take promises for acts. No one who considered the list of dreams and vagaries and theories that have swayed the people through the centuries can doubt this. The more utopian, the more butterfly-like the theory, the more it commands public adherence. Just as the Protocols say, Gentile society does not scrutinize the origin or the consequences of the theories it adopts. When a theory makes its appeal to the mind, the tendency is to believe that the mind which receives it always had it in essence, and therefore the experience has all the glow of original discovery.

In this manner, theory after theory has been exploited among the masses, theory after theory has been found to be impracticable and has been discarded, but the result is precisely that which the program of the Protocols aims for — with the discarding of each theory, society is a little more broken than it was before. It is a little more helpless before its exploiters. It is a little more confused as to where to look for leadership. As a consequence society falls an easy victim again to a theory which promises it the good it seeks, and the failure of this theory leaves it still more broken. There is no longer any such thing as public opinion. Distrust and division are everywhere. And in the midst of the confusion everyone is dimly aware that there is a higher group that is not divided at all, but is getting exactly what it wants by means of the confusion that obtains all around. It will be shown, as claimed by the Protocols, that most of the disruptive theories abroad in the world today are of Jewish origin; it will also be shown that the one solid unbroken group in the world today, the group that knows where it wants to go and is going there regardless of the condition of society, is the Jewish group."

0
0

[–] geovoat [S] ago 

"it could be easily inferred from various items in the program which was depended upon to break up Gentile solidarity and strength.

The method is one of disintegration. Break up the people into parties and sects. Sow abroad the most promising and utopian of ideas and you will do two things: you will always find a group to cling to each idea you throw out; and you will find this partisanship dividing and estranging the various groups. The authors of the Protocols show in detail how this is to be done. Not one idea, but a mass of ideas are to be thrown out, and there is to be no unity among them. The purpose is not to get the people thinking one thing, but to think so diversely about so many different things that there will be no unity among them. The result of this will be vast disunity, vast unrest — and that is the result aimed for.

When once the solidarity of the Gentile society is broken up — and the name, “Gentile society” is perfectly correct, for human society is overwhelmingly Gentile — then this solid wedge of another idea which is not at all affected by the prevailing confusion can make its way unsuspectedly to the place of control. It is well enough known that a body of 20 trained police or soldiers can accomplish more than a disordered mob of a thousand persons. So the minority initiated into the plan can do more with a nation or a world broken into a thousand antagonistic parties, than any of the parties could do. “Divide and rule” is the motto of the Protocols"

0
0

[–] geovoat [S] ago 

"The Gentiles are as ready to sacrifice their plans for the sake of popular success as our people are to ignore success for the sake of carrying out our plans. This psychology of theirs facilitates the task of directing them.”

0
0

[–] geovoat [S] ago 

"we will promise them to return all the liberties taken away, after the enemies of peace have been subjugated and all the parties pacified. "

0
1

[–] geovoat [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So the following is all my own thinking instead of quoting Ford from the immensely important article.

There are so many things here Ford addresses I would have to quote Evey passage.

But the upside of it all is all arguments and philosophies (like capitalism vs socialism or conservative versus liberal) are thrown out by the jews to us like raw meat to dogs and they alone know the goal is to divide us from the importance of family and sustenance until we are rudderless in confusionband disagreement so we accept their guidance and control. It is scary how well this has been working for generations.

You aren't "correct" when you argue for "conservatism" against "liberalism" you are simply playing their game of distraction and division putting on the team jerseys they threw to you instead of building your family and keeping unity among gentiles.

Thus it would seem the only answer is to cease all these arguments when baited and instead see that the goal is to keep us arguing instead of having us work together to control the MATERIAL THINGS AND ASSETS that actually give us freedom and the ability to control society and our destiny instead of letting them control them and us while we argue.

So here is the hardest lesson for me and why I now realize the past 40 years I wasted in political argument are just a waste...So the next time you are about to argue with a liberal or whatever JUST DON'T. Instead tell them the goal is to keep is arguing while others take control of the material resources we need and instead we need to work together to take those back and have children in unity.

We Anglos are truly dreamers and it's why we have invented most of the great things that have improved lives. But the jews use our suseptability toward dreaming against us to keep us distracted politically into words rather than in taking and retaining control of the worldly assets that actually produce all real sustainability and security for our ourselves and our families.

We can't be the Hatfield's and McCoys. We must instead retain our lands and assets and have our children fuck more and fight less have more kids.

(it occurs to me that throwing out fompeteing political ideals to Anglos gentiles is like turning on music in front of a group of Negroes. We can't help but be distracted and decend into useless mental gyrations while others seize control through the music. We are suckers for the distractions of words and noble purpose while we relinquish true hard assets needed for survival )

The jews are not dreamers but merely exploiters of dreamers. They are simple minded and aren't capable of true invention (they can't even fix their own car) but only control of others thoughts and actions. But by sticking that simple methodology the jews get the benefit of all the dreams and work of others whether it is labor of the black man or the inventions of the Anglo gentiles.

Henry Ford was wise enough to recognize the gentiles weakness in the face of these exploitation and admit it.

For admitting your weaknesses are the first step to making yourself immune from those who would exploit those weaknesses.

My respect for Ford has risen immensely.

Epilogue:

So the real question is how can we as gentiles adopt daily habits which prevent us from being sucked into divisions of useless words and baited distractions of philosophies and politics (which to us are like the dance provoking drumbeat for a black man) and instead keep is concentrated on the togetherness of purpose to retain control of the physical things we need to thrive and multiply as a people (and perhaps secondarily keep the benefits of our superior inventive minds from the jews because they will quickly fall behind without us as they will without the labor of the black man.)

0
1

[–] geovoat [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Henry Ford was a genius and it's clear from reading his analysis of the protocols that the least of his genius was assembly line manufacturing of cars.

0
1

[–] geovoat [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"Or consider this from the Fifth Protocol:

“To obtain control over public opinion, it is first necessary to confuse it by the expression from various sides of so many conflicting opinions that the Gentiles will lose themselves in the labyrinth and come to understand that it is best to have no opinion on political questions, which it is not given to society at large to understand but only to the ruler who directs society. This is the first secret.

“The second secret consists in so increasing and intensifying the shortcomings of the people in their habits, passions and mode of living that no one will be able to collect himself in the chaos, and, consequently, people will lose all their mutual understanding. This measure will serve us also in breeding disagreement in all parties, in disintegrating all those collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us and in discouraging all personal initiative which can in any way interfere with our undertaking.”

0
1

[–] geovoat [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"Take for illustration these passages: The first is from the First Protocol:

“Political freedom is an idea, not a fact. It is necessary to know how to apply this idea when there is need of a clever bait to gain the support of the people for one’s party, if such a party has undertaken to defeat another party already in power. This task is made easier if the opponent has himself been infected by principles of freedom or so-called liberalism, and for the sake of the idea will yield some of his own power."

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)