0
0

[–] i_scream_trucks ago  (edited ago)

so we send up bigger drones and drop shit on them.

fuck, hang a rock off one and send it flying straight at it.

2
-2

[–] Vortonet 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Yeah, we actually really want to catch them at the moment tho. It means the difference of stopping a minor outbreak from enveloping the entire country. It is a very dense spot of infection. It literally began from 1 family and shit hotel employees...now many hundreds are dead. Remember this was totally avoidable, the virus was already successfully contained here, no lockdowns or masks. This was entirely avoidable.

0
0

[–] nobslob ago 

Australia is a warning, we on the verge of following in their footsteps. If the US government ever got to this point I would like to believe Americans would finally fight back. But the current lack of resistance against anything is very concerning.

Well more rage inducing and making me fucking hate everything and everyone. But let's stick with concerning.

0
1

[–] AcceptableWays 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Smaller drone with a lightweight square net with fishing weight on two corners and with the other two corners attached by something that tear away easily. You fly it straight into the surveilliance drone, the net would catch and foul a propeller and tear away from your small drone. Sure the nets are consumed but mason line is cheap and so is fishing weight, just need to make a jig to help make the nets.

0
0

[–] Carsandsarcasm ago 

The privacy advocates are concerned about a lack of a sunset clause? That's it? They aren't concerned about this being outright Orwellian?

0
0

[–] PaulNeriAustralia ago 

but petals, look at the wider law enforcement ramifications that will benefit us. Drones could become a more useful law enforcement tool than police in their cars. For a start drones could constantly monitor Melbourne's public gardens where young women seem to get murdered at an alarming rate.