1
3

[–] Aslanisonthemove 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

[TG] NEXT ?

0
2

[–] Qdini [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Likely McCabe/Strzok, but we can hope!

0
9

[–] sheepdoggie 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Oh yeah, she is a class A POS. I hope she sings like an Opera Star. This Tiger Droppings dig is funny, they ripped her up good :

https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/tashina-tash-gauhar-a-name-you-need-to-know--re-spygate-long/91070419/page-2/

0
5

[–] Qdini [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Thanks! Found this gem on the thread about the Clinton emails/foundation:

https://twitter.com/WhiteRabbitNew2/status/1271597999559520256/photo/1

0
16

[–] Overwatch7 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Damn, that is a lot to prosecute. The above is a good example of how connected and corrupt these deep state criminals are. Harder to get rid of than Johnson Grass!

0
4

[–] asymptote_12 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

they should start with something easy to prove and quick to prosecute. Then keep re-trying her adding time and penalties until she is looking at a death sentence. Also investigate her ENTIRE FAMILY. These swamp critters bury money in their relatives.

0
2

[–] SCforTRUMP 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I wish we could us msma on the political weeds!! It works wonders on dallis grass and other disgusting yard crap - seems comparable to the dems!

0
1

[–] 1human 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

wonder who she is related to or married to?

0
10

[–] BarbeQ 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

I have noticed more and more person's in the judicial system and other positions of influence, power and control have names I can't even pronounce. What happened to Smith or Jones?

0
9

[–] Qdini [S] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm wondering if she is Muslim. Infiltration.

Edit: (see post below. Name Gauhar is Muslim)

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] QuiltGRam32 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Good question

0
8

[–] Sanpa33 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Obama had Muslim Brotherhood ties. They had 8 years under Obama with the guidance of his handler,Valere Jarrett, to infiltrate the government.

0
2

[–] scoripowarrior 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Too many "foreigners" in our Government, IMO.

0
5

[–] SuckaFree 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I bet she knows tons about what's been really going on.

0
3

[–] Q20191776 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I remember reading "Tosh" Gauhar's name in the James Baker transcript during Congressional testimony related to MYE (Mid Year Exam). Found the relevant portion on p12 where they were questioning Baker about who from DAG worked with the investigators on the MYE team.

"Mr. Breitenbach. Sorry.

BY MR. BREITENBACH:

Q. Did Tashina Gauhar ever work on it, to your knowledge?

A. Given her position in the DAG's office, she may have, but I don't remember specific --

Q. You don't remember interacting with her?

A. Not very much. I know Tosh very well, but I don't remember interacting with her very much on Midyear?
Q. But some you had interacted with her or --

A. Just sitting here right now, I can't remember. "

0
1

[–] Qdini [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Old JB. Such a douche. Now he's Twitter's douche.

0
4

[–] Q20191776 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Also found Tashina Gauhar in the Moffa transcript during Congressional testimony related to MYE on p167-168, I believe:

"BY MS. KIM:

Q. One unfortunate byproduct of conspiracy theories is that innocent individuals keep getting dragged into conspiracy theories.
A. Uh-huh.
Q. There is a conspiracy theory that an attorney at the Justice Department named Tashina Gauhar was involved with you and Mr. Strzok in doing the secondary review of the new emails. Is that correct?
A. I've never heard that before. Is the question was she involved?
Q. Was she involved?

A. Can I confer for 2 seconds?
Q. Yes.
A. Thank you. [Discussion off the record.]

Mr. Moffa. Sorry. I was just checking on her SES status. She was not involved.

BY MS. KIM:

Q. She was not involved --
A. She was not involved.
Q. -- in the secondary review.
A. No. Of the Weiner laptop? No.
Q. In your opinion, was the review of the emails found on the Weiner laptop thorough?
A. I believe it was.
Q. Was it even-handed and neutral?
A. I believe it was.
Q. Did any information discovered in reviewing the emails on the laptop change the legal conclusion as to whether Hillary Clinton should be prosecuted?
A. Although classified information was found, it was classified information we had previously identified had been mishandled using the email system. And so, for that reason, it didn't change -- and, again, this was not a decision I made -- it did not change the sort of prosecutive implications when the OGC lawyers took a look at it. "

0
5

[–] damessinger 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

She looks a lot like Huma Adebin.

0
3

[–] Qdini [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I think so too

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)