0
0

[–] Diogenes_The_Cynic ago 

Dunno and voat might not be the best place to ask this.

0
0

[–] thelatestme [S] ago 

if u dont mind me being all like eli5 do u mean because of ridicule or big brother watching over glowing voat?

0
9

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If you're so dangerous I cancan't trust you with a firearm, they shouldn't have let you out.

If you're out, you should have all rights restored. If you can't handle having your rights back, you should be in prison.

0
2

[–] H3yGeorge 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Sums up what I would have said. Pretty damn close to word for word.

I'd also add that weaponization of the Justice system lets the jewdiciary decide you can no longer defend yourself for the rest of your life. Add that to how hard it is just to get a job with a felony and imagine making some small mistake but being forced to live the rest of your life in the ghetto.. without the ability to own a firearm.

0
0

[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago 

0
3

[–] FreeBreivik 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I agree with this. Same thing with the sex offender registry.

0
2

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Sex offenders can't be cured, releasing them is immoral.

0
0

[–] Glory_Beckons ago 

I can trust

I think you meant can't.

If you can't handle having your rights back, you should be in prison.

I'd argue that if you can't trust someone with a firearm after their jail sentence, then they should be dead and not in prison. No point in wasting resources to keep someone locked up in a cage until they die. That's neither merciful nor practical.

0
0

[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago 

I think the sentence should reflect our inability to trust. If a murderer is always too dangerous to ever get their guns back, then they can't be trusted with anything and should always receive life, no parole. Just one example.

Just a matter of deciding and assigning severity.

0
1

[–] CharlesVI 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

if your safe enough to be on the streets able to rent a uhaul truck, buy fertilizer, gasoline, and be near children your safe enough to own a firearm. Just another bs infringement based on feelings.

0
0

[–] thelatestme [S] ago 

how can any man know what he will become ? how can any felon ever care to be better than his label of that event whatever it may be if no one will ever accept payment of his debt to society ? must i grow old and frail , unable to defend my life and property , only to die at the hands of real criminals who sure as hell got guns ? to have grown so much in 25 years since all that mess of a young life and no one thinks that guy deserves his rights back ?

0
2

[–] Fried-Laptop 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

it wasnt an issue untill after the immigration act of 1967.

and that prohibited serious felons.. then all felonies. then misdemeanor DV. then most midemeanors...

now, you dont even need to do anything.. red-fag laws..

so, just like not hiring felons, yes.

do the crime, do the time, get out, go about life that much wiser, not being a burden. but, thats what (((they))) want. broken ppl they can abuse & control.

how long untill every white man is accused of an imaginary hate crime that get your guns taken after being plaster'd all over the local news?

0
0

[–] thelatestme [S] ago 

people change and just the fact that no law enforcement agency has heard a peep outta me in 20 + years should be good enough to at least be able to go hunting again or know if i have to go bump in the night back at something or someone that im not gonna be thrown in assrape prison for defending my family or should that right be taken away as well cause ya know a whole generation of felons with no prospect for a family or future could get you a revolution

0
0

[–] AcceptableWays ago 

Hunting you say... Does those really powerfull airgun that can harvest up to a deer count as firearm?

0
0

[–] Usernamenameuser ago 

Benjamin Bulldog in .357

0
0

[–] thelatestme [S] ago 

unfortunately any thing that can fire a projectile is indeed counted as a firearm.

0
0

[–] GreenSlug ago 

Depending on the crime it shouldnt have been a felony, or the punishment should have been the death penalty. None of this half measure stuff. Either you commited a bad enough crime that you deserve to lose your right, via death, or you didnt, and you probably shouldnt even have gone to jail, or at least not for long.

Since we dont do things that way, idk. Felony just covers such a wide range of things, like ive said from deserving death to not even deserveing jail. So its really hard to just say a yes or no.

Im inclined to lead towards no, similar to how i say no voting for illegal aliens, no matter what a nice upstanding member of their communities they may be. Part of the known punishment of the crimes was a loss of rights, go lenient on that and you lose some incentive that the lower among us require in order to behave.