0
9

[–] 25122669? 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Ya can't put that toothpaste back in the tube lol -he said it, it's out there, and the media needs to report it. We know what's up though.

From this point on, you need to ask your liberal family and friends, "if Obama and Biden are shown to be guilty of spying on the incoming and sitting POTUS, and trying to subvert their term, would you be ok with that?" Unless they answer with "NO, I would NOT be ok with that!" immediately, then you know all you need to know about that person. This can go up the food chain to anyone, because in no timeline is this ok, unless you're a marxist commie scum traitor, and once we establish this, we know their blood is exactly what we need to water the tree of liberty.

There is and can be NO EXCUSE for allowing TREASON on a sitting or incoming POTUS. Full stop. That's it. No deals. You're a threat to this republic and need to be dispatched with.

And if they dance around it, while never answering, then you've found a shapeshifting kike, and should beat it in the face with something substantial.

0
5

[–] 25123745? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Should add “and spied using information they knew was falsified”. Otherwise, the person will just say “yes, because he was working with the Russians”. Yada, yada, yada...

0
2

[–] 25123982? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

While it doesn't matter that the information was falsified or not, there's literally no reason -legally or otherwise- to do what they did unless they were trying to subvert our Constitution and laws to sabotage an incoming and sitting POTUS. It's certainly a good followup if they even start to kvetch like kies, but at that point you shouldn't need to even point out that the information was falsified. The Obama admin has lied thoroughly this entire time. It's obvious they're criminals. Doesn't matter if the liberal has TDS, or whatever. The answer should always be NO, it's NOT ok.

But of course, to each their own. I can't tell you how to question those you encounter who have been brainwashed by kikes. You have to do what you think is best. I just think this is a question that doesn't get to have a pilpul answer. Yes or no, period.

4
-4

1
0

[–] 25122410? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Me ❤️ Chanel Rion.

3
-3

[–] 25122710? 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

Unkike yourself coomer, then come back and try to have an intelligent conversation. Fucking nigger kike. "but muh muh dick!!"

1
1

[–] 25122752? 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Heard they are serving fresh jew cuck at the ban hammer buffet this evening.

1
-1

[–] 25125247? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

This comment starts off one of the most ignorant "conversations" I've heard on here for a long time.

Naturally, it's a couple of low IQ morons spewing foulness about "kikes" and "jews", because Jews tend to be so much smarter than they are.

0
2

[–] 25124349? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

OH. MY. WORD! I just had a light bulb moment. 💡 It has never made any sense Why Biden? Going into 2020, the Dems had a broad spread of candidates to choose from, so why was it that by March the string-pullers were busy getting rid of the ones that could actually draw an audience and puffing Joe instead? Well, this video answered that with Trump's lines that were big enough to read between!

These idiots actually believed that a Biden presidency was the best way to protect themselves! Oh, that is pitifully laughable. Protecting Obama administration schemes is the first-place reason for running Biden. There were better candidates if the main goal had been to finish what Q identified as the '16 Year Plan.' But no, protecting Obama & Co. is the #1 and they pushed that 16-yr plan to second place.

It also explains why they haven't given Biden a running mate... They see Bill Barr as dangerous, but he cannot do too much that could look like interfering with an election. I bet the flies on the wall down at the DNC have witnessed a roaring debate over this: on one hand the VP slot means they probably will not be indicted before the election results are known, but on the other hand, accusations of treason can still be made as campaign rhetoric. Trump's best time for talking about Susan Rice as traitor is now, before she could be named as a running mate.

0
0

[–] 25123204? ago 

Archived mirror video from another angle at https://files.catbox.moe/n215tg.mp4

0
1

[–] 25122602? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The more Trump talks shit about Treason and these treasonous people and does nothing, the more he and his administration look like a paper tiger.

0
5

[–] 25122670? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Agree. It is absolutely incredible for a sitting US president to accuse the previous administration of treason. But Trump has managed to water it down so much that people don't even left their heads from their phones anymore to hear it. Can't keep crying wolf and wonder why the people don't demand proof. I am completely confused by this strategy.

0
4

[–] 25123480? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

You make it seem like Trump is the one who escalated the national discourse. Can I remind you of just about every breathtaking anti-Trump hit piece put out by the MSM for going on 4 years?

0
2

[–] 25124658? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

why the people don't demand proof

BCP has a dramatic illustration to answer this. In his video today he had clips of CNN's Briana interviewing Mercedes Schlapp from the Trump campaign. Schlapp gives repeated evidence of voter fraud and Bitchy Briana ends by declaring that voter fraud is statically insignificant and calls all of Mercedes' proof a load of crap. then she repeats that it's crap!
So CNN demands proof and then coldly calls it crap!

0
0

[–] 25123753? ago 

Oh boi will you all feel stupid when the punches circle around...

0
1

[–] 25123806? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The media watered it down, not Trump, for this exact reason. They have been saying he committed treason by 'colluding with thr Russians' for years.... Then as soon as POTUS says Hussein admin committed treason, you and everyone else shrugs it off.

I think this is big. I believe this was a shot across the bow for Joe biden/DS. It was a death shot for them if he takes Rice. Trump will hammer 'treason' to the point where the actual info will be forced to the masses. It wont just be Trump shitting on that parade either, everyone on the right will be going off on what we all know with provable facts already in the public sphere.

Here's an interesting thought. What if Harris "unfollowed Joe Biden", not because he didn't pick her, but because she wants to get as far away from him and the impending cluster fuck the previous admin is in?

0
0

[–] 25124436? ago 

Wrong. The more they sweat the more ammo they use

0
0

[–] 25124810? ago 

You seem to think there's a limit on ammo.

0
1

[–] 25124041? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Notice the reaction of the photographer who looks back in panic when she asks the question. I can't tell if he thinks her question is absurd or if he can't believe she just said it so bluntly.

0
1

[–] 25125570? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Haha yea I noticed that idiot too. Def was thinking "wtf is this question"

0
1

[–] 25124605? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Shit just got real.

0
0

[–] 25125363? ago 

Read the article!

Don't bother with the following "conversation", it degenerates into a bunch of "Jew haters" jacking each other off.