0
1

[–] 25039907? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The vaccine that doesn't exis, is mandatoey?

0
0

[–] 25043792? ago 

The vaccine that doesn't exist is mandatory?

Yes, there are governors and school superintendents who are so demonically deceived that they've decided to not open schools until a vaccine is approved! I think all who fund those schools with property taxes ought to put the money in escrow accounts until the schools are open again.

0
19

[–] 25039910? 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

The vaccine that doesn't exist yet, is mandatory?

0
1

[–] 25041098? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah. Smells.

0
0

[–] 25044395? ago 

More fear mongering.

0
0

[–] 25042454? ago 

That is an attempt to delay ending the "Pandemic" and thus promote mail-in ballots....

P.S. #Obamagate

Tick-Tock > Knock-Knock.

0
3

[–] 25039977? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

If ya don't take a stand on this, then what is next?

0
7

[–] 25040037? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Fuck them. DON’T VACCINATE YOUR CHILDREN! Piss on their loopholes and PROVING it violates your religious beliefs.

0
0

[–] 25040262? ago 

Home Schooling now

0
1

[–] 25040286? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Information About Applied Religious Exemptions

Our legal rights are guaranteed by the free exercise clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. States can only go against this if they can prove a compelling state interest is at stake.

But recent court decisions have upheld the rights of individuals seeking exemptions from immunizations based upon "personal" religious beliefs.

[Sherr and Levy vs. Northport East-Northport Union Free School District, 672 F. Supp. 81, (E.D.N.Y., 1987); Allanson vs. Clinton Central School District, U.S.. District Court, Northern District Court, Northern District of New York (84 CV 174), 1984; Campain vs. Marlboro Central School District, Supreme Court Ulster County Special Term, November 15, 1985; Brown vs. City School District, 429 NYS2d 355; Maier vs. Besser, 73 Misc.2d 241].

On the U.S. Supreme Court level in Frazee v. Illinois Dept. of Security, 489 U.S. 829, 1989, it was found that a state may not deny an exemption simply because a person is not a member of a formal religious organization. In addition, the Supreme Court has noted that nontraditional beliefs, including secular humanism, atheism, and nontheistic faiths, are all "religion" for the purpose of free exercise analysis. The Supreme Court in Fowler v. Rhode Island, 345 U.S. 67 (1953) held that it was "no business of the courts to say what is a religious practice or activity for one group is not religion under the protection of the First Amendment."

http://www.vaclib.org/news/church_autism.htm

0
0

[–] 25043699? ago 

recent court decisions

Recent? Most of the cases you cited are from the 1980s. I don't trust any court since Obama used black-male against the SCOTUS to redefine marriage. That is a sacred "religious" bond. And afterward it was hard as hell to get a religious exemption to not bake a cake, arrange flowers, refuse a venue, turn down a photo session, or engrave invitations.
If you think any religious exemption is still going to apply when challenged in front of an Obama judge, you are living in dreamland.

0
0

[–] 25046233? ago 

Ahem...

In addition, the Supreme Court has noted that nontraditional beliefs, including secular humanism, atheism, and nontheistic faiths, are all "religion" for the purpose of free exercise analysis.

0
0

[–] 25040528? ago 

I expect that some Biblefag can produce a suitable instruction from God about not accepting injections of fetal cells.

0
1

[–] 25040711? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

What vaccine? I thought they didn't have one yet. Are they testing shit on our kids?

And what if I have my own belief system, is that not good enough? I need some pedo in a robe to sign some paper? Fucking pathetic. So much wrong with the world today.

Whoever makes these laws/rules needs to hang.

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)