[–] Lawyer42 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The article is lying to you. They lost the case and they’re just trying to spin it. Here is the actual decision. https://www.scribd.com/document/470394078/Dkt-043-20200724-Denial-1879#from_embed
[–] Psalm67 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Exactly. When I read the ruling on Scribd I saw it was exact he opposite. Of course governors can’t “enforce” in the sense of arresting people etc. the decision was FAVORABLE to the governor. It had nothing to say about restricting the government or police from enforcing these edicts. Unfortunately.
[–] Christosgnosis 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
It's not as decisive after all - the Plaintiffs in this case stopped crowing about it after the Supreme Court ruling came out that backed up the dictatorial power that the governors are exerting. They thought at first their case and the ruling on it could give them some leverage, but now they believe the Supreme Court ruling has completely shut that possibility down
[–] PatrickSTomlinson 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It's not a victory at all.
In short, the court ruled that it will not force Inslee to do shit.
[–] PatrickSTomlinson ago
Then you should probably delete the post. Whoever wrote the article doesn't know how to read legal documents. It's fake news and gives people the completely wrong impression that all's well in Washington when the opposite is true.
[–] obvoiusly 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
No more face Diapers! Ops, after actually readinghttps://www.scribd.com/document/470394078/Dkt-043-20200724-Denial-1879#from_embed it seems that Inslee, as governor, does not directly enforce his proclamations. So the case was dismissed. So some one actually needs to be charged, and the charging officer(DA?) needs to sued. Oh well, Lawyers, what ya gona do!
[–] RToey ago
The solution is to vote out Che Insley in November.