[–] 24828269? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Fukushima nuke plant was a cover story for the radiation. The wave that hit Japan was caused by two to three nuclear bombs detonated off the coast of Japan. This was because Japan was going to introduce the first mass produced car that ran on water. .
That number is probably a bit high.
If you take the 132,000 total claimed deaths, including the guys who died of vehicle accidents (with COVID), Subtract the 60,000 seniors murdered in Nursing Homes, lets call it 70,000 even.
So yeah, about 10,000 Covid Deaths
So say average Flu season of 60,000, add 10,000 COVID deaths, and there you have it, all the Stars and Comets align.
[–] 24825714? 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
The reactors didn’t explode. When nuclear fuel becomes uncovered(The water boils away) there is a reaction with the fuel cladding that creates hydrogen. The immediate atmosphere around the reactor is nitrogen for this very reason...
They didn’t have a hard vent to get the hydrogen to the atmosphere and it combined at unsafe levels and boom, everybody thinks a reactor blew up...
On top of that, pretty much laughable to suggest the radiation from fuck-me-shima was affecting Americans.
The food part might be true, but the misrepresentation of the dangers from the actual event make me question all validity contained in this post, as we should with all posts.
[–] 24826282? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Tell that to the Pacific Ocean salmon, idiot
[–] 24826862? ago
I would...if I could speak salmon.
The ocean is enormous. Dilution is the solution.
[–] 24826864? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
by your own wording the reactor blew up...I'll agree it is highly likely it was because of hydrogen build up and not a prompt criticality incident...
you should really study the migration patterns of sea animals in the Pacific along with the currents...and add air currents to that thought also...radiation exposure is cumulative
[–] 24827341? ago
No, the reactor did NOT blow up. I repeat...the reactor did NOT blow up.
There is the reactor, then around the reactor is an amazing feet of engineering that seals it in and has a nitrogen atmostphere. Aka primary containment. Secondary containment is the building around primary containment, this is a regular atmosphere. This is where the explosion occurred.
You certainly don’t want to spend an extended period of time on sight(at Fukushima)nor buy crops from the immediately surrounding area...everything else? Meh. Quit being such a fag about it.
[–] 24828051? [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
You are totally effing wrong. It blew out 14" concrete, hydrogen cannot do that.
Your claim that the immediate environment around the reactor in nitrogen, is so beyond laughable, that ye be troll or worse.......
[–] 24828154? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Google it.
They use an inert atmosphere in the “dry well” aka primary containment.
Elsewhere in the plant the actually have a hydrogen atmosphere around the generator to increase efficiency, also easily verifiable on the internet.
What, you thought they could split the atom to create enough heat to boil water and insane pressure then convert heat energy into mechanical energy(turbine) and then mechanical energy into electrical energy(generator) but they couldn’t create a nitrogen atmosphere? LOL.
Do they keep liquid nitrogen tanks on site? What for?
If only we could get the answers to these questions.
[–] 24828419? ago
You clearly have zero idea what hydrogen is... or why a nuclear rod itself can't "explode"..
You're losing severe credibility by saying that about hydrogen. Are you maybe thinking of "helium" instead? Because then you would be correct