[–] breadandbunny ago
Ffs, at least spell correctly. If you're so superior, shouldn't you be able to do that?
Sounds right to me. Did he include the right to ACCUSE, falsely, groups around you for your every fault and disappointment in life?
[–] DeltaBravoTango 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
One thing: you should be able to go March for what you believe in without worrying about consequences at work. I’m not saying that you should be able to leave at a moments notice, but that people should be free to exercise their rights.
[–] WhatsThatSkaSong 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
One thing: you should be able to go March for what you believe in without worrying about consequences at work. I’m not saying that you should be able to leave at a moments notice, but that people should be free to exercise their rights.
Bullshit. There are always consequences. Whether it be avoiding work or promoting an ideology that may be destructive. You have a right to protest, you don't have a right to freedom from consequences.
[–] DeltaBravoTango 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That’s what all those cancel culture people say. Free speech should extend to tolerance of differing opinions. Unless it directly affects their job, it should not matter what they say.
[–] Crikes 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Forced redistribution of wealth is dysgenics. The slavers are sick enough to think they can insulate themselves from the fallout behind their walls, but they're incorrect.
Eveyone is harmed. Arguably those who are stolen from are made stronger, but inarguably the ones transfered to are destroyed.
Again, regardless of where or who you are, no one is insulated from the dysgenics of forced redistribution of wealth.
They'd rather maintain their dominion of a sinking ship than free it and not sink.
[–] chonkyjpg 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Spittin facts