So you only rape out of duty and justice - or when you project motive onto me you ascribe me with a different morality because of your deranged silver spoon ego?
Wow. Somehow me asking if you would rape a rapist means I personally want to rape or that I am saying you do. You understand the Socratic method, right? It forces the other person to actually understand their own stance and explain it. I poke a single hole in your idea and you freak the fuck out. And instead of thinking about your own stance, you immediately ad hominem me and get angry like a pink haired liberal banshee.
If someone questions you, why not actually reflect and figure out what you think instead of simply replying with anger and hatred in order to avoid actual introspection. Personal attacks help nothing, and I asked you a genuine question. Maybe you would learn something about yourself if you spent a few minutes thinking instead of being upset and offended that someone on the internet dare question your clearly well thought out morality.
"Somehow me asking if you would rape a rapist means I personally want to rape or that I am saying "
watch the shapeshifter change the context throughout the argument. Truly a disgusting cockroach mind.
When this person brought up rape - it was in the context of making an analogy to an eye for an eye. It was ACCUSATORY intentionally dishonest PROJECTION.
It was not - as later claimed - simply using the 'socratic method' - it was an attempt at using dishonesty to taint the argument.
This person knows exactly what they are trying to do. Thank Yahweh they aren't nearly intelligent enough to pull it off.
[–] Had ago
Wow. Somehow me asking if you would rape a rapist means I personally want to rape or that I am saying you do. You understand the Socratic method, right? It forces the other person to actually understand their own stance and explain it. I poke a single hole in your idea and you freak the fuck out. And instead of thinking about your own stance, you immediately ad hominem me and get angry like a pink haired liberal banshee.
If someone questions you, why not actually reflect and figure out what you think instead of simply replying with anger and hatred in order to avoid actual introspection. Personal attacks help nothing, and I asked you a genuine question. Maybe you would learn something about yourself if you spent a few minutes thinking instead of being upset and offended that someone on the internet dare question your clearly well thought out morality.
[–] WorldClown [S] ago
You didn't poke a hole in my idea by equivocating rape. You poked a hole in your own mask.
You're a liar and a fool.
[–] WorldClown [S] ago
You really are fucking stupid. You can't follow a simple conversation. Or you're trolling. But I have learned to just assume stupidity.
[–] WorldClown [S] ago
"Somehow me asking if you would rape a rapist means I personally want to rape or that I am saying "
watch the shapeshifter change the context throughout the argument. Truly a disgusting cockroach mind.
When this person brought up rape - it was in the context of making an analogy to an eye for an eye. It was ACCUSATORY intentionally dishonest PROJECTION.
It was not - as later claimed - simply using the 'socratic method' - it was an attempt at using dishonesty to taint the argument.
This person knows exactly what they are trying to do. Thank Yahweh they aren't nearly intelligent enough to pull it off.