2
-2

[–] 24704058? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

[MOS] is not mossad israeli intel

its

military

operational

specialty

www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/notes/2009/N3527.pdf

double meanings exist

Q

check out 5-24-2020

8kun.top/qresearch2gen/res/32338.html#32816

the rabbit runs DEEP

anons give credit where credit is not due

1
-1

[–] 24704419? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Gas yourself jew

1
0

[–] 24704619? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

But long before Jews got a military Intelligence (1947) one banking conglomerate had the oldest centralized MI.

The Vatican's Jesuit Occult.

1
5

[–] 24704142? 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

AJ PANIC

0
2

[–] 24704178? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Ha! Not surprised by this.

Hate that fat slab of mossad bullshit.

0
17

[–] 24704345? 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

The point about it being bait is plausible.

0
3

[–] 24706257? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yep. Not saying there’s nothing there, only that we should be careful

0
1

[–] 24704532? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I really hope he gets his very soon.

I wish we had a justice system, an real FBI, real counter intel agencies that would uproot the domestic terrorist's like this filthy fucking mossad asset.

0
1

[–] 24705242? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This comment is antisemitic. You have been reported to the FBI.

0
1

[–] 24704647? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

What became of Zak? Wasn't he Jones' version of Q?

0
2

[–] 24705298? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Still a Buck Private peeling potatoes and cleaning the latrines with a toothbrush.

0
5

[–] 24704717? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

What I sincerely don't understand about it:

-SKUs show many different people so how does it Show anything?

-why on earth would you want to list the actual name, last name in some cases, on the item? Its terribly suspicious.

And what provicated the discovery? Someone seeing a trend on twitter or an anon?

It has all the requisite charitaristics of disinfo to promote distrust/discredit within our circles.

0
2

[–] 24704835? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Plausible deniability, that's why.

0
0

[–] 24706642? ago 

Supposedly this has been going on a long time, but only now does it come out. Why? Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.

0
1

[–] 24707897? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Listing the actual name makes complete sense. If you're asleep it has zero meaning. To them it means everything. As soon as shills like you say there's no logic in listing the ACTUAL PRODUCT you fail.

0
1

[–] 24707948? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No it doesn't.

The murder abusers don't care who they are/were

I'm not a shill I'm criticaly looking at the facts. The skis are showing many victims

0
0

[–] 24710773? ago 

It's been floating around on social media for weeks. Suddenly it all comes together and goes semi mainstream. Doesn't seem organic to me.

2
-2

[–] 24704792? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

The Wayfair conspiracy makes no fucking sense. Why the hell would child traffickers use a public catalog site? These are all super rich people who use other people to contact the sex traffickers. Find those middle-men and bust them and they'll bring down the billionaires.

0
1

[–] 24705222? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

because all comms are traced?

this is why you are poor, you are dumb.

0
0

[–] 24705235? ago 

I don’t claim to understand it but some comments said it is not so simple. There is a real “advert” but the transaction is something else (obviously NOT shipping the child in said “armoire.” Think of it as a front for people in the “know” who alone can communicate, make transactions etc. the average “joe” couldn’t just buy one of these(or the pillows for that matter) and then unravel the trafficking ring (if indeed there is one regarding Wayfre).

1
0

[–] 24706235? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

It isn't our conspiracy theory anyways... r/conspiracy Reddit & twatters... it kinda crashed into pedogate/pizzagate with they used the SKU product numbers in Yandex (which coincidentally was shown in Mouthy Buddha's 2nd pedogate vid the beginning of last month). The bitch part is how amateurish it was and how frustrated now it is because the fucking idiots didn't bother to capture and archive stuff so that by the time the chans and anons saw the trend and started taking a look... well much was lost. So it may be a couple to a few weeks, if ever to get down to the bottom of whether there's anything substantive there let alone what is is... if ever. I think there is something there... but other than trying to unravel and inspect the whole mess... it ain't a Q thing.

0
0

[–] 24706990? ago 

I'm curious to know - Did ANYTHING get archived on this? Real anons would have archived this 6 days from Sunday long before bringing attention onto it. I've only seen screenshots so far.

And it's not that I don't find this thing plausible in terms of sick fucks doing sick fuck things, but would sure like more than screenshots to go off. Thanks for the lead on where to look further. You're right, not a Q thing at all.

1
-1

[–] 24708063? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

imo its astroturf to troll us

load more comments ▼ (34 remaining)