[–] 24708586? ago (edited ago)
Wayfair dig
I disagree with this Wayfair speculation presented as evidences. Speculations are NOT to confuse with evidences.
This is your reminder that according to the Laws, all are considered innocent unless proven guilty
If you use a speculation to claim that someone is guilty, you risk to expose yourself to an expensive libel lawsuit. Why? Because in the future, a speculation could be FALSE & DEFAMATION. Read more.
Is someone trying to fool you into a defamation? Could the person targeted by defamation be in fact a lawful & real Patriot? Speculations are valuable to make theory. While at the same time, speculations and theories are NOT to confuse with evidences, facts, truths. The Laws, courts, juries decide if someone is guilty. Speculations and theories do NOT decide those.
This is an example of a successful filled defamation lawsuit. By Donald Trump against the New York Time's FAKE news at
https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/2017/web/hero_images/Draft_NYT_Complaint_(NY_State_Court).pdf or https://archive.md//2q1kf
News at https://nypost.com/2020/02/26/trump-campaign-sues-new-york-times-for-libel/ or at https://archive.md//8F9AD
[–] 24709260? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
this is as good a confirmation as a Snopes "debunk."