birth control is available-
not nature or natural to ban sexual pleasure
for 10 years from 8 to 18 (eire 17).
teach instruct practice.
the other of course as evidential proof,
countries with AOC at 13 or 14 must recognise their
young as at higher level of maturity, 5 or more years more advanced
and mentally capable than those forcing 18 as AOC
[–] riseagaineire [S] ago (edited ago)
''for 10 years , from 8 to 18'', you might want to study human growth and development , instead of the koran, are you saying to me you desperately want to fuck an 8 year old? Teach what?
[–] kojre3 ago
"study human growth and development"
is what the politically correct "professionals"
have been issueing to support Denial of Nature for last 50 years. they otherwise
would not get published or gain work. have to follow the ignorant politicians "line".
hence Gay became legal as a means of gainibg votes. - just like playing to
the vets or pensioners or jewish or irish community - all fake ploys to get elected.
"desperately want to fuck"
from an age when i became aware of my "Nature" provided pleasure "nerve endings"
i have never been desperate hence never was or will be a drug addict or alcoholic etc.
i am in control of my pleasure not by a dictat of some politician or quack psychologist
political animal - whom changes "goal posts to suit ignorant politicians.
(just survey "quacks" whom where medicating or electro shock therapy gays
befoe change and see if they hold their same "mental strength of conviction"
regarding gays.now laws changed.
i was aware i heterosexual and self pleasureing at age 5. i was not taught
for many years - how to gain and give pleasure (in safe manner hence avoid abuse).
the "abuse" i received was by ignorant politicians supported by religious and
parents and other adults whom failed as humans to question- so i was left
as ignorant as they and seemingly you and majority Today.
i am sure you fumbled\did not know how when firsst contact with oppisite sex
in a sexual pleasure setting.
you seem to want to force that on others is it "vengeance" (for your embarassment?).
or gullable moron accepting what the politicians and quacks foist upon you.
just how does a judge "prove is not a denier of Nature and commiting crimes
against humanity to support ignorant politicians" if judge is reviewing video
DEEMED child porn which shows a 14 year old girl actively and hapily as seen enjoying
sex - just how as a human "judge\balance" and as what is "Nature correct" the
judge should Refuse to pursue any charges.
!Teach what"
obviously you have not learned or are developmentally slow.