0
5

[–] tweety51 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Yes yes yes!

0
5

[–] rickki6 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Yup

[–] [deleted] 2 points 39 points (+41|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

1
16

[–] FirstDamsel 1 point 16 points (+17|-1) ago 

Been telling my 77 year old mom the same thing since testing began. DON'T GET TESTED!

0
5

[–] WillGreeley 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

You are right! We should all refuse to let them use those anymore!

1
9

[–] brettco12 1 point 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

Now I see all my retarded friends talking about being tested. How are they so stupid?

1
6

[–] LeeDoverwood 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Because they're retarded. What surprises me is that my friends like this completely believe what they are told. They're like children.

0
1

[–] chocolatepatriot2 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

mind control thru fear and trauma.

NO MORE POISONOUS VACCINES EITHER. NEVER!!!

0
6

[–] Lyonessrising 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Agreed. I also wont do those genetic tests either. My cousins son gave one to my aunt.

Within weeks she started having odd health issues.

Blood clots in lungs now issues with water in legs.

She was healthy and now shes a barrage of strange illnesses.

I refused testing so now I need to find another job.

0
4

[–] numina18 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

That wouldn't hurt enough.

0
5

[–] User7867 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Because bacteria is resident in virtually every healthy person's sinus cavity.

0
13

[–] 4TheRepublic 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Bacteria (pathogenic and non-pathogenic) and viruses are 'resident'/present in the nasal cavity (i.e. vestibule) and nasopharynx of every person ... healthy or not. The mucosa of the nose and mouth provide defense against pathogens.

IOW, the mere presence of potentially harmful bacterium or virus in that mucosa DOES NOT indicate 'infection'.

0
10

[–] alphazebra 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Bingo. That’s why PCR tests are vague at best. It may indicate the presence of a pathogen but it can’t tell how much there is in the body or if the person is even affected by it. It’s unwashed data that can be used to manipulate and skew anything you want.

2
16

[–] Jiggggg 2 points 16 points (+18|-2) ago 

I keep telling everyone I can - DON'T GET TESTED. If you are just absolutely made to get tested (I don't know why you would, but whatever), spit on the test or blow you nose and wipe that on the test or something.

DON'T LET THEM PUT ANYTHING IN YOUR BODY

0
5

[–] CokeOrPepe 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Military forces it

0
0

[–] dmandnm ago 

Not yet.

0
6

[–] WeAreWinning 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

If you want medical procedures they make you get tested.

0
1

[–] Intlrnt2 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

True

0
1

[–] ammonthenephite 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

My roomate has been tested and tested negative, so not every test is preloaded for a positive result. Like others have said, testing is a requirement prior to some medical procedures.

0
1

[–] corrbrick 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

May not apply, there's really no way to tell, but PCR test are notorious for both false positives and false negatives.

0
4

[–] Silver_Sky 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Playing devils advocate, the higher concentration of the virus that they can test, the more likely the test will give an accurate result. Accurately testing for the virus in a water solution 100% saturated with viral particles is easier than accurately testing for the virus on one of these bore cleaner q tips. If you were to bkow on the thing, you would likely only deposit a few tens of thousands of viral particals - enough to make someine sick, but that's an astronomically small amount of mass to test for. Roughly speaking, these viruses are 10-100 nano meters in size IIRC which is much closer to being the size of a single atom than to the size of a human cell. I know a lot of these tests rely on decomposing the viruses DNA, RNA, or proteins and watching for them to bind to chemicals, and a very real problem with this kind of testing is not having enough viral material to get over the activation threshold of the testing chemicals, therefore you need to get a dense sample to guarantee accurate results. Now, whether or not these tests are accurate is another question...

0
1

[–] alphazebra 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

See my response to @4therepublic above

0
3

[–] avanti 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Worth watching

(I like the fact that it's Q minutes long.)

load more comments ▼ (28 remaining)