0
0

[–] KosherHiveKicker ago  (edited ago)

"we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal"

I reject the premise of the declarative statement.

Natural selection proves it to be false. We need only to review the known, and accepted evolutionary conflict(s) that we have detailed in just the DNA of Homo Erectus.

  • Neanderthal are accepted as "men" due to our current population having verifiable DNA attributed to them.
  • White European "Mankind" of today are the result of over 75,000 years of brutal conflict, and interbreeding with the Eurasian Neanderthals.

What made Europeans White is directly related to this conflict and proves that there are HUGE genetic advantages, and disadvantages that deny the false premise of "ALL Being Born Equal."

Niggers never made a civilization of any note until contact with White Eurasians. It is only after this contact that Niggers advanced AFTER the benefits from the dissemination of White Eurasian knowledge, culture, and other distinct practices.

We can extend on the clear differences in the stone tools created by the White Europeans, And those used by the Niggers of Southern Africa. Whites took stone technology to a much higher level than Niggers. It is a clearly demonstrable fact that Neanderthals are responsible for the first industrial process in recorded history.

0
1

[–] QueenMab_II 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

That's a good question, and Happy 4th, by the way. Unfortunately, it seems most people have never actually read the Declaration of Independence and just parrot the "all men are created equal" line. Considering that the bulk of the document is squarely focused on the King's "history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States", I think it's clear that, at the very least, it's a resolute rejection of the monarchy and of the idea of the "divine right of kings."

0
0

[–] i_scream_trucks ago 

That women are property.

1
-1

[–] Joe_McCarthy [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Kinda implicit, yeah. But not the point being conveyed.

0
1

[–] VandalayIndustries 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Lmao.

Not much of a deep thinker are ya?

3
-2

[–] Joe_McCarthy [S] 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Well, I'm not equal to a high school dropout who comes in with "lmao" and insults... that's for sure.

0
2

[–] VandalayIndustries 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Definitely not.

Learn your place little fella!

3
-3

[–] Joe_McCarthy [S] 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

The usual downvotes from the swine that are unworthy of the pearls cast before them.

But a note on the cultural origins of the American Revolution From Sir Edward Creasy's The Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World: From Marathon to Waterloo (1851):

The five northern colonies of Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and Vermont, usually classed together as the New England colonies, were the strongholds of the insurrection against the mother country. The feeling of resistance was less vehement and general in the central settlement of New York, and still less so in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and the other colonies of the South, although everywhere it was formidably strong. But it was among the descendants of the stern Puritans that the spirit of Cromwell and Vane breathed in all its fervor. it was from the New Englanders that the first armed opposition to the British crown had been offered; and it was by them that the most stubborn determination to fight to the last, rather than waive a single right or privilege, had been displayed. In 1775 they had suceeded in forcing the British troops to evacuate Boston; and the events of 1776 had made New York (which the Royalists captured in that year) the principal basis of operations for the armies of the mother country.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51fEzT7PPkL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Which is to say that the essence of America is Puritanism. And to understand America and its revolutionary ethos you must understand Puritanism.