[–] Hayle 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Well ghislaine was brought in by the FBI yesterday for crimes committed from 1994-1997 during Bill Clinton’s presidency. I was thinking prince Andrew as well but BC would be a more shocking arrest, a former us president? I mean holy crap that would be amazing
[–] MaggieMaySmith 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Logical re Slick Willy. I really don't see the DOJ/FBI going after Prince Andrew. He is not going to go the the USA and UK would not extradite.
[–] Manolis_Gledsodakis 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
UK would not extradite
Don't be so sure. Boris keeps surprising us and he's currently draining the Britbong swamp.
[–] 24Trilionbucks ago
Yes they can. She is not a political candidate and is not immune from an indictment for her corruption. Even if she suddenly became a candidate, the investigation into her crimes began long ago. She is going down.
[–] DammitMan ago (edited ago)
Edit: I did a damned good job of getting egg on my face. I definitely need more coffee before I comment in the mornings. @Six_Cents I went back and could not find HUMAnity. Only Humanity. @Manolis_Gledsodakis yes I did.
Huma Abedine. Her name is pretty well known. She’s really close to HRC. Q has been saying HUMAnity instead of humanity or HUMANITY. Misspellings and capitalizations are always intentional, unless quickly corrected in a subsequent drop.
DammitMan,
Could be Huma I guess. Huma would definitely have the goods on Hillary and Bill. As far as Q spelling "HUMAnity" as you claimed, can you provide a proof for that please? I have never seen a drop where Q spelled it that way.
[–] Manolis_Gledsodakis ago (edited ago)
Her name is pretty well known.
Only in the USA. Try asking a Brit who she is. Or a Greek.
And you misspelt "Abedin".
[–] bansai-pomisan ago
considering the last link "one leads to many" , which points to the Clinton-Foundation, that would likely suffice for both - Bill and Hillery.
But there's also that 'Q'-Message, which definitely points to Obama : "the first one will send out shockwaves" together with Obama's CIA-Code-Name "Renegade" . Obama and Biden would belong to a military tribunal (treason with the Flynn-case ) . The same for Hillary, but with the russia-hoax against Trump. But let's see, what happens on July 4 - Independence-Day - would'nt take me wonder then, to see a 'Q' Post with a Photo of Obama in Gitmo .
[–] 24Trilionbucks ago
Bill is not shockworthy. Hillary would be the shocker.
[–] 24Trilionbucks ago
I say that because it is already established that Bill is such a pervert. He cannot go out in public without someone shouting he is a rapist. Hillary is still functioning, even stalking the 11th hour nomination, still viable player. Taking her out would leave the Dems with no viable candidate since the Clinton machine engineered it that way. It would virtually guarantee that Trump would essentially run unopposed.
[–] skidder 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The problem with arresting Hillary or Obama is that it will be seen as political. Soros comes to mind, perhaps Bill Gates. I can't think of too many people within the U.S. that would be a "shock" other than the ones mentioned.
[–] Manolis_Gledsodakis 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I'd like it to be Billie Gates. She's a mass murderer and really deserves to go down. A long way down.
[–] bansai-pomisan ago
@skidder, don't forget, both - Hillary and Obama have comitted treason, which would take them before a military tribunal . So that nobody could blame it to Trump , if the military arrests Obama , because of his action against general Flynn