[–] ddtourist 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
The science is unequivocal that face coverings reduce your risk of contracting the virus. Whether you take common sense safety measures or not shouldn't be dependent on whether you like the people telling you about them. I don't get why these are difficult concepts.
Wear one if you want but understand you look like a little faggot who enjoys being bossed around by authoritarian lefties.
You're the one who's letting "authoritarian lefties" determine your behaviour; you're so eager to rebel against them that you're putting your own family in danger.
If they did want to commit "white genocide" they couldn't have more willing idiots than you; all they need to do is tell you not to jump off bridges and they'd have squashed your Resistance in one stroke.
[–] ravensedgesom ago
"It is also instructive to know that until recently, the CDC did not
recommend wearing a face mask or covering of any kind, unless a person
was known to be infected, that is, until recently. Non-infected people
need not wear a mask. When a person has TB we have them wear a mask, not
the entire community of non-infected. The recommendations by the CDC
and the WHO are not based on any studies of this virus and have never
been used to contain any other virus pandemic or epidemic in history."
https://technocracy.news/blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-the-healthy/
[–] ravensedgesom ago (edited ago)
The science is not unequivocal Peggy Hall exposed that on jewtube. CDC mask deception exposed. I like to breathe and rather not suffer the health consequences of having a facemask like hypercapnia or hypoxia or the build up germs around my face and in my lungs because of the lack of fresh air. Mask are only for creating a sterile environment in hospitals there is zero science in it supposedly preventing someone from getting sick. It's nothing but a ritual in submission and dehumanization. If you want to be a bootlicker wuss then that's on you I will not obey this tyrannical overreach.
[–] cyclops1771 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Who said this is the correct response?
Again, why is NOT getting it the correct response?
Danger of a cold/flu? Covid-19 is not worse than the flu in terms of bodily affects. It's actually milder than H1N1 and SARS1. It just spreads faster, like SARS did. It is not putting your family in some kind of mortal "danger" or any danger other than possibly getting sick. Did you wear masks, and demand economic shitdowns during flu season? Did you hold your kids out of school for weeks every winter if a classmate was sick? What activities did you completely curtail prior to Covid because you were in fear of the "danger" of being sick? Did you avoid all gatherings of people (stadiums, supermarket lines, high school events, movie theaters) before Covid because you were scared of catching something?
I'm being partially facetious and partially serious here. There is no cure for common colds, virus, etc. The ONLY way is to get your body's immune system to fight it off. On this, the science is ALSO unequivocal.
There are two views here writ large (the others are minor points, and may be valid as solutions, but not positions, if that makes sense?) - avoid never getting sick again, or build up herd immunity.
I think that herd immunity is better for the community because it allows people to move freely. The avoid getting sick thing - this is not normal behavior. The overreaction, as if Covid is an immediate death sentence, is what people are rebelling against, and the ones who are shoving this overreaction down our throats as "mandatory" because THEY are scared and have fears is annoying at best, dangerous in its own right at worst. The issue is that the people dmeanding and accepting and promoting mandatory actions are promoting fear as a virtue - the more fearful, the more virtuous. It is a never ending, vicious circle, that feeds upon itself until it becomes stifling. Fear is not a virtue.