[–] ASW1984 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It never ceases to amaze me how hard the shills try to control the narrative, how they immediately discount the evidence provided with just a sliver of MSM as their rebuttal.
BTW I provided a full length professional documentary, not a podcast. But you'd want to discredit that too I suppose.
[–] alele-opathic ago
Yes, which is what I said. Here is a proper cited definition. Again, the judge sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment, then said the court would waive the penalty if he paid 200 pounds, which he did. It is still a finding of guilt.
A finding of guilt (you have to be found guilty before you can be sentenced, as he was) isn't even remotely related to 'won'.
It doesn't help their case unless the finding was of not guilty/responsible, which it wasn't.