0
0

[–] Armpit_and_Ass ago 

Tired of all this winning yet?

0
1

[–] CowWithBeef 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

So even if Trump replaces Ginsberg, he still won't have influenced these types of decisions? Unreal.

With the demographic situation, we're never going to be able to vote our way out of this. Independence movements are the only viable solution. CHAZ should probably be encouraged and supported by all free people in the USA. Its success will inspire others. It's probably a psyop too. We're pretty well fucked it seems.

0
1

[–] stromble 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

that's fucking bullshit. federal govt is in charge of keeping secure the nation's borders, not the states.

0
0

[–] BlowjaySimpson ago 

Mighty thirsty.

0
7

[–] MongolianPaellaFish 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Trump picks the Supreme Court justices, and Democrats are still winning. What a time to be alive.

0
5

[–] sbt2160p 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

The Federalist Society picks judges. Trump just picks from the list. Thanks, Jews!

0
5

[–] xExekut3x 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

But the Supreme Court, in a decision written by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, has said state and local officials are not obliged to carry out federal enforcement. That state’s rights doctrine appears to have prevailed.

I actually agree with this. But this should also mean the federal government doesn't have to give that state any federal tax dollars, for anything, until they comply.

0
1

[–] NACHTJAGD 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Correct.

Also it does not set precedent because refusal to hear does not mean that in the future if it is ever brought up again or if 2A sanctuary city/county/state is ever brought before the SC. You can bet if left wins after 2024-2032 time frame they'll be attacking and trying to get 2A sanctuary abolished by getting a ruling against it by the SC.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] QuickMafs 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

They still won't give us any of that either, do you seriously expect these people to actually be consistent?

1
1

[–] klobos 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

This is a good thing. States rights over federal rights. The way it is supposed to be. Now states can choose to be sanctuaries and prosper or fail from their decisions. This should be applied to every major issue, like abortion, for example. Let states decide and after a few short years we would see which decisions are good and which aren't.

0
1

[–] DanglingGoatBalls 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Let states decide and after a few short years we would see which decisions are good and which aren't.

That would work if the (((Governors))) and (((Mayors))) were not (((controlled))). Even though the red states didn't do the virus lockdown as hard as the blue states they still played the game enough to seriously fuck the health of medium and small businesses.

I seriously doubt there are hardly any Governors left that are not Freemasons.

0
3

[–] InyourfaceNancyGrace 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Just so we refuse them federal aid when they become the burning piles of refuse they're setting themselves up to be. I'm sick of pouring money into cities with failed policies that refuse to change the policies that made them failures in the first place.

0
0

[–] RedBullTrooper ago 

That was my first thought too.

It’s a back handed way of winning.

0
1

[–] ShadowWatcher 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Has anyone seen Ruth Bader Ginsburg alive since 2 years ago?

0
0

[–] Dr_Tyrone_Watermelon ago 

just a body double

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)