[–] BalfourYourFace 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You know these assholes are gonna sue and get money
[–] BlackGrapeDrank [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
falling statue and gravity be rayciss
[–] deathcamps4boomers 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
he wuz piecefully stan ding unda da raycis stachew, according to Green’s wife, Tonieh Brisbane-Green-Jackson
[–] Dr3dpierat 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
"Now Green's wife said she was upset that protesters "didn't think" when they pulled the statue down."
Seems to be a common theme with chimp niggers.
[–] BlackGrapeDrank [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
he must have missed the course on gravity at riot engineering school
[–] SmokeyMeadow 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
The guy was standing directly in front of a fully taunt tow rope that was under a load of several hundred pounds. It's not like he was some great model for situational awareness.
[–] BlackGrapeDrank [S] 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
the wypipo that built it from the past
[–] OpakapakaCaca 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Trump most likely.
Where have you been the past 3.5 years?
[–] NakatomiBaby 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
Gravity comes at you fast.
[–] BlackGrapeDrank [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
gravity be rayciss
[–] satisfyinghump 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I really enjoyed your submission title.
Not sure how this works, but it seems goats have some of the most creative minds, especially when it comes to these sorts of "zing's, gotcha!" Type titles and comments.
[–] BlackGrapeDrank [S] 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
thx bro. it's the Gentile creative intelligence that keeps us going
[–] Charilko 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago
Here’s the real question: are the little assholeswho toppled that thing going to get charged with murder if he dies? The dude in Charlottesville got a crazy stupid sentence for something that should have been considered self defense. This was a clear malicious act.
[–] BlackGrapeDrank [S] 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
of course not. the bar is set so low for niggers they can kill and destroy with impunity as long it's backed by Jewish shekels and a bogus cause
[–] cdglow 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This was a clear malicious act.
I don't believe that they intended to drop a statue on somebody's head. That part looked like an accident from idiots. I believe manslaughter would normally be charged in this kind of accidental action that caused somebody's death. I'm not a lawyer, but I'd bet that manslaughter during the course of other crimes (such as public vandalism) would often be treated harsher than a normal accident, but I'm not a lawyer (IANAL)
PS: James Fields from Charlottesville should have been considered complete self-defense as he was fleeing a violent mob, or about the lightest manslaughter possible if a charge had to be applied.
[–] uvulectomy 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
"I don't believe that they intended to drop a statue on somebody's head. That part looked like an accident from idiots."
It's called felony murder.
"The rule of felony murder is a legal doctrine in some common law jurisdictions that broadens the crime of murder in two ways. First, when an offender kills (regardless of accidentally or without specific intent to kill) in the commission of a dangerous or enumerated crime (called a felony in some jurisdictions), he/she is guilty of murder. Second, it makes any participant in such an offence criminally liable for any deaths that occur during or in furtherance of that offence. In short, deaths that occur in the commission of a dangerous offence or enumerated offence (enumerated = stated in statute, e.g. rape, etc.) is murder.
While there is debate about the original scope of the rule, modern interpretations typically require that the offence be an inherently dangerous one, or one committed in an obviously dangerous manner."
These people were engaged in rioting and vandalizing public property. They were in the process of committing a felony, and their actions were inherently dangerous (as proven by someone suffering life-threatening injuries).
If he dies, then everyone involved in toppling that statue can be held liable for murder.
[–] Nerva 1 point 11 points 12 points (+12|-1) ago
"There was no need to do all of that especially while there were so many people around that statue knowing that somebody’s going to get hurt.”
If you do not agree with what they're doing, then why stay? Why not move if it's pretty obvious you're in the danger zone? No, instead keep lying about how you only support peaceful protests, and how it's everyone else's fault that Karma was doing it's job.
Not going to lie, I read this article, and the first thought that came to my mind was "good." No empathy for uncivilized vandals will ever be had from me.
[–] BlackGrapeDrank [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
yes. good. fuck this guy and his low IQ cohorts.
[–] RoBatten 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
No critical thinking, at all . . .
[–] puggy 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
except he will run up a million $ medical bill that the taxpayers will cover