There will be no UN troop deployment in Seattle. Democrats might really want that but they do not have the authority to request it and Trump won't allow it. If the UN attempts to send troops into Seattle without Trumps permission, that would be an act of war which I'm sure is something the deep state would love.
[–] Moldy-Locks 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Assuming Q is not some giant psyop, then it would be hilarious for Seattle to invite UN blue helmets onto American soil.
However, if Q is some giant psyop then we're fucked if they bring the UN in. Because it would then set precedence for defunding the police, because racism and shit, and having the US occupied by the UN while simultaneously funding the UN with US taxes.
[–] nohiddenmeaning [S] ago (edited ago)
The point you brought up about the UN being funded by our taxes sparked an idea.
What if Seattle does bring in UN troops and there is violence between the UN troops and Autonomous zone or protesters or just even Americans in general, this could be a situation where we could justify not only removing but also prohibiting future UN troops in America. And then we could push to leave the UN and stop contributing to it and kick the headquarters out of the US.
that would be good, like when we stopped funding to the WHO.
[–] Gotrek 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The best thing that can happen is to completely ignore them... Even if they call in the UN. This is on the mayor of that city and governor of the state. The Feds need to stay out until called upon by the governor. Yes it sucks for everyone else who lives there and sees the inaction but that's how you deal with kids when you're not allowed to spank them because they might write a book.
[–] Awake2Truth ago
It is an interesting idea. Don't think Trump would put up with it, but I could see the Dems encouraging this move.