0
0

[–] SerialLarper ago  (edited ago)

Mat_21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of Yahweh shall be taken from you (House of Judah)

This wasn't about the house of Judah, the elites and the people didn't have a common attitude to the Messiah:

45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.

46: But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet.

They've tried to SEIZE THE INHERITANCE in many ways over time. Both Esau and Judah ...

No, Judah didn't lose his inheritance by giving the tokens to Tamar as surety. Gen 49:10 also contradicts your position on Judah since the people have not gathered to Shiloh.

The Root of David OVERCAME THE LION OF JUDAH

No, the overcoming relates to the opening the scroll. Link

There are also TWO BETHLEHEMs. Bethlehem Ephratah and Bethlehem Judah ... one is NORTH of Jerusalem, one is South of Jerusalem

Source?

The wolves DID indeed enter in and devour the original flock ... then gnostics

The Gnostics didn't have a unified philosophy, Gnostic Christians were an ofshoot of the original Gnosticism. Gnosis (as knowledge) was endorsed by the Messiah:

Hosea 6

6 For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of Elohim more than burnt offerings.

Matthew 9

13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

Also there's the key of knowledge (literally gnosis in the Greek):

Luke 11

52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge (γνῶσις): ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

The leader of the wolves in hinted at in Zechariah:

For, lo, I will raise up a shepherd in the land, which shall not visit those that be cut off, neither shall seek the young one, nor heal that that is broken, nor feed that that standeth still: but he shall eat the flesh of the fat, and tear their claws in pieces.

Zechariah 11:16

0
0

[–] AngelofDeath [S] ago 

You've given nothing to contradict what I've mentioned it seems to me.

I already gave you audio with sources.

Yet another.

https://cuabtyler.org/two-bethlehems-in-israel-at-the-time-of-christ/

https://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=13&article=1219

0
0

[–] SerialLarper ago 

You've given nothing to contradict what I've mentioned it seems to me.

Sure, just keep on ignoring Matthew 21:45-46 and pretending that Matthew 21:43 is about the house of Judah.