[–] UlyssesMcGill 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
You've misinterpreted my question. Your formatting leads me to believe your anger has slightly clouded your vision.
You're viewing the dynamic between Mel and Wife-10kids.
She doesn't need to incentivize him to make ten MORE kids with him.
She needs to incentivize him to spend time with the EXISTING ten kids. Which would in turn yield endless grand-children and great-grandchildren.
My argument was not for or against traditional values, or whether or not Mel is upholding them.
I was pointing out that you were incorrect in identifying the Matriarch's necessary means for achieving the correctly identified goal: Keep Mel around.
[–] Helena73 2 points 5 points 7 points (+7|-2) ago
you were incorrect in identifying the Matriarch's necessary means for achieving the correctly identified goal:
Not sure what means you think I misidentified. The means for keeping the dog from straying or for discouraging homewreckers, is social taboo, public infamy.
But the real fallout of this sort of situation is that all women everywhere see this and say there is no justice for the abandon wife who has stretched out her uterus ten times for this jackass, zero repercussions for him— it does not pay to have 10 kids and stay with a bum, it does not pay to have 2 kids. If you get pregnant abort it or just sue him for child support. Bleed him for whatever you can. Because if you enter into a marriage contract in good faith this is what you can expect.
It really doesnt matter what Mrs Gibson can get out of Mel at this point. No one will get married if they are going to be treated like garbage. It’s the fuckin precedent.
This is how a great wave of divorces happened in the 70s and 80s, guys tired of the old ball and chain just walked out and found a new piece of ass. Its what happened to a lot of the parents of the kids I went to school with. The guy got a new wife.
Men are 50% responsible for feminism and the deplorable state of sexual politics today. The zoomers don’t remember how we got here but I do. The men wanted to be free. The men wanted no strings attached. Here we are.
[–] HiJoker 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Thank you for encapsulating the whore mentality of how the pussy is a factory and women want paid for it either if it's making babies or sexing a dick.
Nope, sorry, it's going to be back to being property with the lot of you. This is another jewed up experiment that ran off the rails and died.
There's a good lass for pointing that out, now run along now and make tasty sandwiches.
[–] NoBS 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
The men wanted to be free. The men wanted no strings attached. Here we are.
Liberated woman used to be a free choice, now it is mandate set in public ridicule.
Do you know why some traditionalist woman did not want the right to vote? Because it at first demanded the privilege of dying for freedom with the included draft or service.
Today any criminally insane leech can vote, so it was a wash anyway.
[–] Angryelectrician ago
dont be a slut maker
[–] UlyssesMcGill ago
How many females have you had sex with?
How long have you been with your current partner?
I wouldn't ask this, but you've entered this conversation judgmentally, and as such, must reveal your own honor before I even stoop as low as to defend myself from your unfounded and unnecessary advice.
[–] Helena73 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
So morals are only for poor people. Rich men can shit on the institution of marriage. Yours sounds like a great society, where do I sign up?
Disposable wives happen because men thought they could have their cake and eat it and every guy could be a polygamist. But the math doesnt work out. Polygamists build hellworld societies like Islam and Hollywood. Enforced monogamy is the way of the civilized strong european family.
[–] Bremertonbruiser 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Interesting. The Apostle Peter gathers young men of the church together to care for widows...I wonder was he preventing just such a thing. I'm still with my highschool sweetheart by the way.
[–] Helena73 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Of course. The church was in charge if all this stuff. But you didnt get shit if you were an unrepentant entitled whore telling other people they owed you just for drawing breath.
There is no accountability for bad actors today or even a way for good actors to confirm that their “charity” ie forced taxation is going to anyone worthy of it.
P.s.- good for you, she’s / he’s lucky to have you!
[–] Bremertonbruiser 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I see the distinction thanks again. I wasn't being argumentative by the way. Just got off a twelve. It's a she. I'm a he. Since I've been woke to the j q I've just been trying to figure out how to defeat it. I have a few ideas. I don't like hearing defeatism from folks I know want to be part of the solution (not directed at you). Thanks for insightful comments, blessings in Yeshua.