[–] [deleted] 0 points 18 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago
[–] Guide 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
I like @fulldisclosures idea, but it would be a Dictatorship, the people can't be trusted!
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] Arotaes_Forgehammer 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
Probably a three-branched direct democracy with mandatory voting. Free speech would be enforced everywhere.
[–] Arotaes_Forgehammer 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Or probably a ten dollar fine, or something. It's like a speeding ticket.
[–] muffinmandible 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
In Australia you can either vote or get a fine, it does result in people donkey voting, though.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago (edited ago)
that's not how it works, they still need something to live off of. It is completely up to them whether they want to trade or keep it. You can ofc give them pawn-credits for what they price it off of. The key thing is that only the fair minimums are protected, meaning once you make over a certain amount, it becomes greed, not need. Producing extra is rewarded with pawn-credits. The extra goes to those who do not have. in the form of seeds, or land, or etc. Teamwork is the goal, and if you're only leading for yourself, then you're ruining everything for others.
[–] CatNamedJava 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
what if I don't want to share my surplus, and What if I want some of the surplus of others as well?
[–] voat-ist 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You know those two things are as far apart as possible on the economic system graph right? Exact opposite quadrants.
If you want communism with goods/money and libertarianism with personal choices and freedoms you are describing classical liberalism.
[–] fulldisclosure 1 point 22 points 23 points (+23|-1) ago
I am God Empress of Dune. Clothing is optional.