[–] cool_and_froody ago
A meritocracy. Thise with the most expertise in each field make the laws about that field. Perhaps with a neutral htird party qualified in morality or anthropology and law to ensure no corruption takes place as a result
Constitutional monarchy where the constitution would protect people from tyranny and where the intellectual elite could vote on major, controversialist decisions.
Also, what would Machiavelli say?
Constitutional monarchy where the constitution would protect people from tyranny and where the intellectual elite could vote on major, controversialist decisions. Constitutional court would be the only thing that could truly challenge the ruler and legality of his/her rule. It would be composed of reliable people trained and educated from very young age that would ensure that constitutional monarchy and the planet remain protected. These people could not own land or property to ensure that they cannot be easily corrupted...something like a strick religious order-the constitution would be their religion. In extreme circumstances, the monarch would be granted more privileges. Those circumstances would be: war, disease, hunger, natural disasters, extremely desperate post-war conditions or anything alike. His/hers extra privileges would be stripped the very moment those "extreme circumstances" end. In those times, the ruler would be something like Roman dictator.
In that system, laws on the freedom of speech would be very liberal. Slander and libel against the monarch would be met with harsh penalty. Threats, death threats and speeches killings or genocide would be punished harshly. But there would be no such thing as "hate speech" or "speech that offends me".
In that system, I would do my best to promote positive eugenics and discourage those with severe hereditary genetic disadvantages from reproducing, for the sake of the whole planet. Google Hotwheels (admin of 8chan) opinion on eugenics if you are confused about "positive eugenics"....I fully and completely share his views.
Of course, this is one of those issues where the intellectual elite could vote on: they could agree on it, oppose or change it. That means that most of the "IGNORANTHiTLERNAZI!!!" crowd could not vote at all. Sure, there still would be there, but they couldn't legally organize outrage/harassment campaigns....those campaigns would accomplish absolutely nothing. Of course, none of them could vote against the constitution.. The constitution would be considered sacred. But that would also mean that no ruler could enforce forced sterilization of others or or order mass extermination of ethnic groups.....by doing so he would lose his right to rule and constitutional court (as previously said, that court would be something like religious order) could force him to either get to his senses or GTFO. BUT...that ruler would be granted extra privileges in extreme circumstances-like in case of extreme overpopulation. In those cases, she/he could enforce "one child policy", deportation or forced sterilization. Because overpopulation is not a joke and it affects us all and "feeling"s could ruin us all.
The greatest challenges of such a system would be:
1)What do to in the case where a monarch suddenly died without hairs and didn't appoint anyone to replace him. The constitutional court could appoint the most capable individual, but there would be a huge risk of intimidations and rebellions.
2) What to do in case of corrupt ruler? Constitutional court would be powerless if he didn't violate constitution and he would still have huge power over the whole planet.
3) What to do in cases of coordinated media campaigns, bribed by foreign governments? Machiavelli, help me here pls....you didn't live to see the power of modern media and how effective it is.
4) What to do in cases or open rebellion and how would a ruler stop himself from becoming a tyrant?
5) What to do in cases of very powerful rulers that decided that constitutional court is no longer necessary and that they should be absolute rulers of the planet? Even if constitutional court could legally say "fuck this shit" to the ruler and obliterate him and his attitude, that would still be one hell of a civil war.....and the whole system gets fucked. I could already see nations, factions, new religions, new governments, new EVERYTHING coming out and the whole planet turning into chaos. And my system is failure. RIP.
Okay, this comment was mostly my "deep" (2deep4you) daydreaming (no fapping), something I wrote while seriously daydreaming and imaging a whole new world...because I am funny like that. This was not an argument at all, I did not try to argue that constitutional monarchy would be the only right way. I was describing my day-vision.
But modern day democracy is indeed joke. In this system, there would be no expensive election campaigns, no "bread and games" every 4 years, no wasting millions of [insert currency] for pre-election nonsense. There would no "left and right" candidates that are actually close friends, no fake elections for the same thing, no fraud referendums, stupid decisions wouldn't be made to appease the stupid majority. No matter how flawed the constitutional monarchy is, I would prefer that system over what we have in most of the western world. Of course...who would monitor muh "religion court? How could I be certain that they would not meddle with referendum votes? What if brainwashing them would not be enough? What the f I am even writing about?
I'm really interested in this, seeing how it will be scientist that arrived first that's where the government will start. Evidence based reality and not opinions trying to force an ideal.
Prioritizing need over greed. What jobs do we need filled, what resources does everyone need to stay alive, what do we need to improve, what do we need to do to prevent instability or disasters, and what do we need to remove the need to survive so we can go onto living.
I want to incorporate the waste management practices used in business/warehouses with needs. Make it as effective and efficient as possible, using self sustaining technology so it takes a lot to cripple survival.
The government would either be a jury duty style selection system, a system that includes those effected to be a part of each individual policy being created, or a simply balanced representation of each demographic similar to a meeting of every union head so every group of civilians/workers has at least one voice.
Education would be split into two, education everyone needs and takes part in all their life and education that trains specific job skills.
Once the fight for survival and poverty is covered, people are free to live their lives how ever they wish in their personal persuit of happiness. Depending on the population, that will determine how tolerant we can be with dangerous lethal crimes. Non-lethal; if there is no victim, who gives a shit but if there is a victim you repay them, fix the damages, or work for the individual as community service until the issue is resolved.
Non-inherited monarchy. Basically the king will be tasked with grooming his replacement, but the replacement can not be related to them or belong to an allies family. The aim is to remove bloodline succession and create a type of oversight council that will keep the king/queen in line and prevent the creation of valued bloodlines. The successor will be chosen by the council from the King or Queen's candidates that they had been grooming during their reign. You see they will have about 10 or so well educated candidates that they had given additional education about proper governing. Upon the death of the regent the council will interview the candidates and pick one to become the next king. Corruption in these preceding are punished by painful execution. The additional candidates will be used in advisory roles with massive oversight to prevent plots to seize power. The rest of the governing will be up to the king. Since I would be first I would set up some kind of representative government to keep the people believing they have a bit of control, but I have unlimited veto power.
[–] lettersofmarque ago (edited ago)
Constitutional dictatorship with a clone of Antoninus Pius as emperor.
[–] llagerlof 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
MyThe constitution will have just 2 rules: