[–] 24107662? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It was more than just an illegal server, and it was more about the intent behind the illegal server. If the reason it was installed in the first place can be proven, and transactions tracked from foreign countries to HRC or anyone connected to her, it becomes a whole different ballgame.
[–] 24105899? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Listened to parts and the end. Bottom line, the matter "is submitted," which means the Court of Appeals has 90 days to rule. Hence the September date, which is the latest date the Court can rule. The decision could come sooner. And i would not assume it will be a pro-Hillary decision. One judge noted cases has been ongoing for 5.5 years. They might rule for JW in light of established sto ewalling.
[–] 24104954? [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Here is Sara Carter’s piece Judicial Watch Fights Hillary Clinton For Testimony In U.S. Court Of Appeals
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals submitted the case, which is adjourned until Wednesday, September 9 at 9:30 a.m.
[–] 24104856? 0 points 20 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago
Now you know why Milatary Tribunals are so important...
[–] 24104861? [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I see your point.