0
5

[–] 24104787? [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Uh because motive to hide stuff is correlated with hiding stuff. Are you serious? /s

0
5

[–] 24104825? [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It sounds like someone is going to try to argue that the emails should be immune BECAUSE they were on a private server. I think they are trying to kill our brains with logic puzzles.

0
3

[–] 24106197? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

It was an ILLEGAL server.

0
3

[–] 24107662? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

It was more than just an illegal server, and it was more about the intent behind the illegal server. If the reason it was installed in the first place can be proven, and transactions tracked from foreign countries to HRC or anyone connected to her, it becomes a whole different ballgame.

0
20

[–] 24104856? 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Now you know why Milatary Tribunals are so important...

0
2

[–] 24104861? [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I see your point.

0
2

[–] 24104954? [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Here is Sara Carter’s piece Judicial Watch Fights Hillary Clinton For Testimony In U.S. Court Of Appeals

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals submitted the case, which is adjourned until Wednesday, September 9 at 9:30 a.m.

0
0

[–] 24105012? [S] ago 

Not until September?!?! WTF?

0
0

[–] 24105057? ago 

“The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals submitted the case, which is adjourned until Wednesday, September 9 at 9:30 a.m.”

One more postponement will push it back until after the election which is Killary wants and she knows if the Dems steal the election, whatever clown gets the Dem nomination will have the case tossed.

0
3

[–] 24105899? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Listened to parts and the end. Bottom line, the matter "is submitted," which means the Court of Appeals has 90 days to rule. Hence the September date, which is the latest date the Court can rule. The decision could come sooner. And i would not assume it will be a pro-Hillary decision. One judge noted cases has been ongoing for 5.5 years. They might rule for JW in light of established sto ewalling.

0
0

[–] 24105957? ago 

OK, AG Barr, what's the DoJ's next move to counter this most recent travesty?

0
1

[–] 24106096? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Good question. At least the DoJ made it clear they didn’t need the ruling reversed.

0
3

[–] 24106209? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Case resumes in September, on time to arrest HRC in Nov.

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)