1
2

[–] 24041048? 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I think you will find the Supreme Court rules otherwise. You either a social media platform (open to free speech) or you are a publisher (can control content). If you are controlling content (a publisher) you are subject to a different set of rules.

0
2

[–] 24040917? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

you're a fucking retard. Don't you understand the liability shield? They keep censoring and they get fucked because it means they are a publisher and they will be sued into oblivion. Take that back to @jack you piece of shit twitter faggot.

0
1

[–] 24040909? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nah they are going to bake my straight wedding cake and like it. Discrimination is not allowed goyim just like the fisa working both ways so does policies.

0
0

[–] 24043850? ago 

"Wax my balls."

0
0

[–] 24043593? ago 

Try thinking this through. Imagine if your phone calls were fact checked or your emails. If the Government or Corporations want to interfere in the public discourse then they need to expect a backlash. Twitter built its business by providing a platform. If they decide to change then they should expect that we, the people, will treat them differently.

0
0

[–] 24042715? ago 

OP is stating what the sheep have been brainwashed to 'think' so they don't protest the destruction of their republic.

0
0

[–] 24041952? ago 

TRUUUEEE!

also ITT -

Self-aware wolves everywhere. OMEGALUL

0
0

[–] 24041524? ago 

Sigh. Another shill thread to distract us.

0
0

[–] 24041954? ago 

Do you write your comments in bold because you have low self esteem?

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)