0
0

[–] 24041329? ago 

Good faith actions require rules to be broken. You're not allowed to ban "bad people", that's a perfect example of bad faith.

If they didn't violate the stated terms of service, any action against then makes you a publisher, and you lose your special legal protections for it.

Twitter is now going to choose, instead of cheating by playing both sides.

1
-1

[–] 24041442? [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules

Synthetic and manipulated media: You may not deceptively share synthetic or manipulated media that are likely to cause harm. In addition, we may label Tweets containing synthetic and manipulated media to help people understand their authenticity and to provide additional context.

0
0

[–] 24041559? ago 

What sort of legal precedent is there for "synthetic" and "manipulated" media?

I assume the reporter from CNN who just got caught using his cell phone to play gun shots during his segment is manipulated, and therefore anybody sharing stories from CNN gets banned, right?

No?

Oh. Sounds like they're the poster child of bias then.

Twitter is now about to choose whether it's a publisher and give up its legal protections, or a platform that needs to stop its biased censorship of people they dislike and call "bad" for having the "wrong opinions".