[–] thebestisyettocome 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Sue ? have no money to get a lawyer. The damages will be done.
Trump says no mandatory covid vaccine. Mandatory when our governors make it so.
[–] TexasInfidel 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The SCAM of all amendments
People still don't understand exactly what it says.
They refuse to understand it, the proof is there for those that can feed themselves
[–] ArielQflip [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yes. Agreed! Mind, Body, Spirit, Soul!
Feed them ALL to become WHOLE!
Keep those who seek to govern tyranicallly OUT of OUR lives. [They] have shown thier true colors!
[–] sheepdoggie 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
They already took free speech and put a muzzle or mask on the populous. Should we have to wait for somebody to have a boot on their neck while they are injected ? Because that's already happened too.
My advice is that those who are left are not coming back from the brainwashing and psychological damage. Let it go, pull the pin, throw the grenade. After the explosion , stand up , get the fuck out of your house and storm the appropriate buildings to physically remove those we know to be TOXIC.
This is where we are at. Governors have already administered execution programs , funded Planned Parenthood etc.
To finalize my visual of what your trying to argue....
Effectively since at least 1980's Babies, fresh out of the mothers womb, having surved the threat of abortion, were held down and injected EXACTLY as you describe. The total is in excess of 100 million babies, almost every one born since then, and you know what ? NOT A PEEP.
[–] alphazebra 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago
That will all be true but all it takes is for all companies that hire to require vaccination like a drug screen. Healthcare is already that way. Poof, you can’t get a job. And let’s face it, not everyone is cut out to be an entrepreneur. We have to go at it as a discrimination issue. Would a company refuse to hire someone HIV positive? No, that would be a serious discrimination case. So, that’s how patriots will need to approach the coming “Great vaccine force-out.“
I've already won a round with my employer trying to force the flu vaccine on me. I filled out their religious exemption form and had a family pastor fill out his part. It was accepted within hours. I have to file it yearly so I made copies and will send the same thing every year as my beliefs don't change regarding the vaccines.
[–] howdoyoumakeahormone 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Bill Gates is on video telling people that his vaccines are for depopulation. He is now on our mainstream news pushing admitted weapons of mass destruction, with compromised politicians moving lock in step. Nothing yet has been done. His crimes in Africa remain unanswered.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
[–] ArielQflip [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Cornell Law says this:
The Due Process Clause provides that no states shall deprive any “person” of “life, liberty or property” without due process of law. A historical controversy has been waged concerning whether the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment intended the word “person” to mean only natural persons, or whether the word was substituted for the word “citizen” with a view to protecting corporations from oppressive state legislation.41 As early as the 1877 Granger Cases42 the Supreme Court upheld various regulatory state laws without raising any question as to whether a corporation could advance due process claims. Further, there is no doubt that a corporation may not be deprived of its property without due process of law.
43 Although various decisions have held that the “liberty” guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment is the liberty of natural,44 not artificial, persons,45 nevertheless, in 1936, a newspaper corporation successfully objected that a state law deprived it of liberty of the press.46
A separate question is the ability of a government official to invoke the Due Process Clause to protect the interests of his office. Ordinarily, the mere official interest of a public officer, such as the interest in enforcing a law, has not been deemed adequate to enable him to challenge the constitutionality of a law under the Fourteenth Amendment.47 Similarly, municipal corporations have no standing “to invoke the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment in opposition to the will of their creator,” the state.48 However, state officers are acknowledged to have an interest, despite their not having sustained any “private damage,” in resisting an “endeavor to prevent the enforcement of statutes in relation to which they have official duties,” and, accordingly, may apply to federal courts “to review decisions of state courts declaring state statutes, which [they] seek to enforce, to be repugnant to the [Fourteenth Amendment of] the Federal Constitution . . . .”49
Either STAND YOUR GROUND OF LIBERTY AND LIFE, or be a SHEEP/NPC who gives his LIBERTIES UP!
FUCK THE QUAGMIRE OF ignorant REGULATIONS! FIGHT!
I would gladly give up my FREEDOM the Constitution affords to show that:
If you don't know the repercussions of not following a "guideline", from your employer, your Corporation, your LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL governments, your clients of livelihood then you don't know your RIGHTS.
This is not NEGOTIABLE!
[–] KarmaPuleeze 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
OP, you've got the 4th and the 14th switched up.