[–] Carsandsarcasm 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
You know it's not actually about contributing to society, right? People don't get jobs and pursue hobbies because they want all the people of the world to be enriched by their work and presence. This isn't Star Trek. They do these things for themselves. Working is about earning the means to raise a family and live a full and comfortable life. Achievements are about making the best use of your limited time on Earth.
The fact we have created a system in which we all work in specialised fields that compliment each other at large is just a way of making it more efficient for us all to do what we really want to do. When people contribute to society, what they are really doing is advancing themselves for their own benefit and some surplus from that benefits others. The idea is that you would want to do something with your life because you're finite and there is more to the world than what happens on TV tonight. It's not for some idealistic, communist "greater good" where we all just love each other so much that we want to make speadsheets 8 hours a day. You should contribute so that you can get some money and spend it on things that will outlast your existence.
[–] VirtualUnicorn [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
...I'm not sure what the point of this comment was, but thank you for the misanthropic philosophy segment.
so you just troll everyone with stupidity it seems?... christ you're such a loser you have me defending a mod i hate
[–] LibertarianForChrist 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The fact that the weak are forcibly propped up by the strong, and that unity has been substituted with societal prostitution, is what will lead to the death of the 1st world. Complacency and the inability to function or change is not a trait of fitness. With a lack of fitness comes either extreme circumstances where the strong adapt get rid of the weak, or the whole species dies off and is replaced.
The whole hard times-strong men-easy times-weak men thing.
[–] TheStapler 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha fucking hilarious, kill yourself fatty!
[–] LibertarianForChrist 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
I am against a national health system for as long as there is an obesity epidemic. A war amputee is disabled, a blind person is disabled, a fat is not disabled.
mentally disabled?... i feel like there's an argument for that
[–] LibertarianForChrist 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I really don't want to give the rainbow brigade free healthcare.
[–] BACKSTREET_BEETUS 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Honestly the Medicare system here in Australia would be so fucking amazing if there was no obesity.
Edit typo.
While we today qualify obesity as a disability, let's face it - it's a 'disability' that can be cured. They can go on a diet and work out and they'll lose weight and no longer be disabled. A blind or deaf person cannot simply 'work on it' on their own and suddenly be abled. Sure, they may be able to have surgery or use devices to assist them, but it's not something that they can do on their own.
Plus, obesity is a disability of choice - fats CHOOSE to shovel food into their mouth. A soldier going to war doesn't WANT to come home missing his legs
[–] OdinsMessenger 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Yeah, pretty sure Freddie would've said no thanks to whatever adipose abomination posted this, then went and vomited in a corner. "Fat bottomed girls" back then would be considered anorexic today.
[–] derram ago
non-imgur link: https://files.catbox.moe/muh6se.jpg
This has been an automated message.