0
1

[–] CMAnon 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Damn nice to see that the article was published. Whether it's read is another story. It's a start though and a welcome one. Let's see if the Dems throw Yahoo under the bus. I only wish it would have spent more time on the journalistic curiosity when evidence mounts. I bet MSM will never go this far. They'll spin and not care if they lose all their viewers. As long as they have the funding of Soros and other deep pocketed left, they'll ignore everything except the talking point they're instructed to say.

0
0

[–] gatoreric [S] ago 

Indeed, it will take exposure of bigger proportions before they come around. Their current leaders (CIA et al) will need to be replaced.

0
1

[–] QDPie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

WOW - yes it does. WOW WOW WOW. This is a site Dems read all the time. You can see from side articles that they are not exactly Trump supporters at Yahoo. But this article is damning and spot on. Archiving it AND printing it to PDF with all the comments.

Not my OC - but kudos to "Pamela" - whomever you are. This is a great response. Quoting here for posterity....

Pamela2 days ago

About 2 1/2 years ago, several FBI managers were fired or forced to resign for abuse of power in the Trump/Russia/collusion/conspiracy/treason scam - Baker, Page, Priestap, Strzok, Rybicki - before Barr, Horowitz and Durham were twinkles in anyone's eye. Bruce Ohr, 4th in charge of the DOJ was demoted twice and not fired because he admitted his role in the scam. They illegally unmasked names, leaked classified information, illegally doctored credentials and applications, forged signatures, illegally entrapped and spied on Trump and campaign workers or advisors. They say they were targeted because they hate Trump and two of them were engaged in an illicit affair. No one gives two poohs who hated who or who was screwing who.

Michael Horowitz testified on his 437 page report on Capitol Hill at the same time the impeachment hearings were going on. Some of his findings are: 1) There was no "testimonial" bias. No staffers told him they are biased government workers. Imagine that. 2) His 437 pages vindicates no one. That threw some pretty cold water on some victory laps. 3) There were others who participated in the abuse of power - Holloway, Clinesmith and Paarmann to name just a few. 4) FBIers accepted over 300 bribes from members of the press during the period investigated. 5) The Steele dossier WAS in fact the primary document used to get approvals from the FISA judges no matter how many times we were assured by Obama's national security directors it was not. 6) The CIA, FBI, DOJ and state department KNEW the dossier was a fake, but they leaked it to the press anyway, knowing the low information voters would buy it hook, line and sinker - and they did with the most salacious lie being that Trumppeedall over prostitutes (Golder Shower) in a room Obama had slept in. 7) The Russians who gave Steel the information admitted they lied to him. 8) Comey admitted under oath he unmasked and leaked classified information to his Columbia U. friend so he in turn would leak it to the press. 9) Fusion GPS was paid millions to establish a parallel fake Trump treason trail to that of the FBI, CIA, DOJ fake trail. 10) Loretta Lynch was "shockingly absent" from her duties and responsibilities in overseeing this. 11) Sally Yates, Rod Rosenstein, etc signed off on FISA apps without verifying them - there was doctored info in them - nor did the FISA judges themselves verify the information. The level of incompetence and/or complicity was also shocking. 12) Horowitz believes it was Fusion that led the scams. Nelle Ohr of Fusion carried info to Bruce Ohr of the DOJ who in turn handed the info over to the FBI. They have admitted it.

There is so much more. The crats like to refer to the above actions "little mistakes", only not one of those "little mistakes" worked in Trump's favor, did they. Horowitz could not interview any government worker who had left their job, nor could he investigate overseas where some of the abuse of power took place. But Durham can, and he is. Durham will not be submitting a report for our eyes, he will be handing out indictments. Horowitz, Barr and Durham will not be throwing cover Trump - he is doing that himself. He is privately paying investigators and others to investigate the fake collusion, conspiracy, treason charges. And Obama and others have now commenced a distract/deflect/destroy campaign. The proof is not going away, Barack. I hope Trump pays people for the rest of his life to track down every single person involved in trying to frame him for treason. #"littlemistakes"mya$$$$.

0
0

[–] Balthsgirl ago 

They are a business, so it stands to reason with all that's coming out, that they would want to hedge their bets so they can end up on the right side of history and keep their ad revenue going. Can't do that if they stay on the wrong side and nobody will read their shit in the end.

0
0

[–] moderator99 ago  (edited ago)

None of this means that Obama committed some specific crime; he almost assuredly did not.

It looks like they still think he's innocent. They're obviously controlled by him and they're going to help him throw others to the wolves in order to try to save himself.

0
1

[–] gatoreric [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Consider this--usually they do 5 paragraphs of unfounded Trump accusations and then 1 line of "But Trump has not been charged with a crime"--one line of truth buried in a sea of crap. This time BO gets the treatment except we know the evidence is real. Keep watching, as of now the National Reviews and Yahoos of the world don't know what we know of Obama. we have intel from Q.

0
0

[–] Patranon1 ago 

Whoa!!?! Yahoo news?? Are you sure? Wow. That's actually pretty amazing. Have some reporters been indicted or something?

0
0

[–] PGLiterati2 ago 

Well, don't want to rain, but this is an article by National review that Yahoo has republished.

0
0

[–] lifeduringwartime ago 

Yoohoo is not a source, imho. Not a dig on OP but they are the news that is printed to fit.

0
4

[–] MolochHunter 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

consider this:

for the frst time in over half a century at least we have the hard left (anti vaxxers) marching WITH the hard right (constitutionalists) against the establishment

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)