0
11

[–] Six_Cents 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Hell hath frozen over.

0
2

[–] RoBatten 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Even better than the article are the comments! Everyone agrees! People seem to be waking up.

0
11

[–] TRFBYTrC0mmies 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I’m not ready to declare the tide has turned as a result of one article, but, it’s pretty damn shocking that yahoo would be anywhere near that article.

0
6

[–] 45andQ 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I wonder if some journalists have been indicted and now they see their fates in front of them. That would be awesome!

0
2

[–] mac1221 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Laying the groundwork for Biden's removal? - enter Hillary? Obama is willing to possibly take the hit here to keep the attention focused on him and his cronies and not her. Clog up the news cycle - hey look over here and not over there. Haven't heard much about Hillary's misdeeds as of late. Hmmm... Maybe some twittershere reminders would be in order - just to refresh everyone's memories.

0
8

[–] SumfinElse 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

They had me until this...

"None of this means that Obama committed some specific crime; he almost assuredly did not. In a healthy media environment, though, the mounting evidence of wrongdoing would spark an outpouring of journalistic curiosity."

Most assuredly's hairy asshole!

0
5

[–] 45andQ 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

They had to stick that in there or their tiny viewership would revolt. LOL!

0
3

[–] gatoreric [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

right now with the evidence the National Review, Yahoo, etc has they don't see a specific crime yet like we do. We have intel they don't know about concerning BO. Look at the flip flop though--usually they give 5 paragraphs of anti Trump BS and then just 1 line of "but Trump has not committed a crime".

0
1

[–] Balthsgirl 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well it IS on yahoo. They had to put some sort of disclaimer in there. I'm surprised there wasn't more than that.

0
1

[–] QDPie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well they had to toss that in to save their hide. Them there is what we call "Weasel Words."

0
4

[–] wayne 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's just linking a National Review article.

0
10

[–] gatoreric [S] 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

exactly, a liberal site linking to a conservative one. And not just any article, but one thoroughly slamming Obamagate and other corruption. In the past they would have written a hit piece challenging it, or called it fake news.

0
6

[–] still_winning 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I am very impressed that yahoo linked it. It's a good start.

0
4

[–] rickki6 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

yahoo wow

0
4

[–] bopper 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Well that's interesting..

0
4

[–] MolochHunter 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

consider this:

for the frst time in over half a century at least we have the hard left (anti vaxxers) marching WITH the hard right (constitutionalists) against the establishment

0
3

[–] AndyMan_45 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Be careful with the National Review. That place is run by jonah -------------->goldberg<-----, who I believe is whoopi's sister.

Not on our side.

MAGA

0
0

[–] scoripowarrior ago 

No, National Review is not a publication I've bothered to read in a very long time. They hate Trump. They are full of elitist delusions.

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)