0
0

[–] Balthsgirl ago 

They are a business, so it stands to reason with all that's coming out, that they would want to hedge their bets so they can end up on the right side of history and keep their ad revenue going. Can't do that if they stay on the wrong side and nobody will read their shit in the end.

0
0

[–] moderator99 ago  (edited ago)

None of this means that Obama committed some specific crime; he almost assuredly did not.

It looks like they still think he's innocent. They're obviously controlled by him and they're going to help him throw others to the wolves in order to try to save himself.

0
1

[–] gatoreric [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Consider this--usually they do 5 paragraphs of unfounded Trump accusations and then 1 line of "But Trump has not been charged with a crime"--one line of truth buried in a sea of crap. This time BO gets the treatment except we know the evidence is real. Keep watching, as of now the National Reviews and Yahoos of the world don't know what we know of Obama. we have intel from Q.

0
0

[–] Patranon1 ago 

Whoa!!?! Yahoo news?? Are you sure? Wow. That's actually pretty amazing. Have some reporters been indicted or something?

0
0

[–] PGLiterati2 ago 

Well, don't want to rain, but this is an article by National review that Yahoo has republished.

0
0

[–] lifeduringwartime ago 

Yoohoo is not a source, imho. Not a dig on OP but they are the news that is printed to fit.

0
0

[–] swimrobin ago 

Holy crap! Has Hell frozen over?!

0
0

[–] Qanonplus1 ago 

It's a soft peddle.

0
0

[–] MudPuddlePie ago 

Yahoo??? Wow...

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)