[–] Joe_McCarthy 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
Will probably become more familiar as they start mimicing OnlyFans to stay competitive and take advantage of the new relaxed atmosphere.
[–] Armpit_and_Ass [S] ago
And I bet you'll be right there, beatin' it 'til it bleeds.
[–] Joe_McCarthy 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago (edited ago)
Depends who the girls are. I'm pretty out of touch with celebrities under 25 these days. OnlyFans should have arrived in the Jessica Simpson and Britney Spears era.
I think Ariana Grande is 25 though.
[–] Rockfish1000 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I noticed something about 15 years ago. If you look at the headlines in the tabloids at the supermarket check out line, they always refer to these celebrities by their first names. It's like they are trying to get the reader to identify with these people on a first name basis. I am amazed at how many if these people I have absolutely no clue who they are or what they are "famous" for.
[–] StarbuckAndCasey 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
We gave up our tv about 10 years ago and have no clue who current 'celebrities' are (or what movies have come out in all that time). We only hear of popular culture stuff like that from voat or a couple of other sites. It's great.
I heard about the movie Dragged Across Concrete on voat so we went to the theater to see that because it sounded good and we like Mel. Can't remember the last time we saw a movie before that lol.
[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
[–] Armpit_and_Ass [S] ago
(((hahahahah))) wow you (((really))) got me with (((that one))) (((omgrofl)))
take meds schizo
[–] chirogonemd ago
Wait, you mean it's not Kim K's traumatized younger sisters anymore? Shit, I must be getting old.
[–] skullfuku 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
What's a "dailymail"?