0
1

[–] 23794403? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Fucking Hypocrite. Hope he is tried for treason. Corrupt PoS.

0
8

[–] 23794476? 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

This is a big deal. I'm going to track down some more info on why amicus briefs aren't allowed in criminal cases.

Sincerely, your friendly anon from the other thread.

0
8

[–] 23794636? [S] 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Cool. I think it boils down to hearsay. This is trial court, not appellate. Even at appellate, Ginsberg said the parties are primary. Here, the parties have washed their hands and moved on.

0
5

[–] 23794677? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I'm actually going to enjoy reading these briefs. Seeing accomplished lawyers stain their own reputations with legal gymnastics will be satisfying. The Flynn case is so cut and dry, they can't possibly have any real legal reasoning.

2
-2

[–] 23795239? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

What a waste of time

0
0

[–] 23795414? ago 

Judging done in facts not opinion

0
1

[–] 23796713? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Judge Sullivan Makes Unusual Political Move – Delays End to General Flynn Case!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/judge-sullivan-makes-unusual-political-move-delay-justice-general-flynn/

Judge Sullivan – Who Previously Accused Gen. Flynn of Treason – Orders Prosecution to File Response to Gen. Flynn’s Motion to Dismiss by Monday May 4

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/judge-sullivan-previously-accused-gen-flynn-treason-will-file-response-flynns-motion-monday-may-4/

0
2

[–] 23794525? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Enjoying the Judicial suicide. He doesn't have any play. Frickin glorious!

0
2

[–] 23794538? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Sullivan has to have a motive for doing this....

Figure that out and we'll know once and for all if he is opposition or controlled...

0
1

[–] 23801658? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's laid out in this thread how he's been corrupted:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1207100791154184192.html

0
4

[–] 23794540? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Sullivan is looking for 'upstream guidance' on how to resolve the Gen Flynn issue. Things are about to get pretty interesting (not that they haven't been). Enjoy the show!

0
0

[–] 23794554? ago  (edited ago)

Everything I'm finding so far indicates those filing an amicus brief have to be filed by entities described as "a non-litigants with a strong interest in the subject matter." I'm not sure how any private citizen can have a "strong interest" in Flynn's case, at least not the way I'd interpret that term.

0
1

[–] 23794805? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Especially since Flynn didn't actually lie about anything. LOL!

0
0

[–] 23794849? ago 

Details, details.

0
1

[–] 23794733? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I'm reading some interesting theories about applying "prosecutorial vindictiveness".

0
0

[–] 23794788? ago 

https://archive.ph/wip/g8loO :

Techno Fog on Twitter: "Of note is Judge Sullivan's prior denial of amicus briefing:

"Options exist for a private citizen to express his views about matters of public interest, but the Court's docket is not an available option."

Read the full motion here:

t.co/s8zJvgM6NJ… t.co/MT0NPflJdx"


This has been an automated message.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)