KEK! Even better ... DOJ never provided any facts to present to the court (how Flynn's actions impacted any legal proceeding) for the court to rule on. Corrupt attorneys trying to thread the needle on that one should be glorious.
[–]23794841?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
Considering Flynn was actually a cooperating witness in the other FARA case, I agree, they would have nothing. The only other case that would apply, the fake investigation of Trump, is one they can't admit was actually open on the day of the interview.
[+]23795082?1 point2 points3 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]23795082?[S]1 point
2 points
3 points
(+3|-1)
ago
(edited ago)
You still around? I figured out how Sullivan MIGHT be wearing a white hat. Don't even want to post it as a new thread, on the off chance I'm right. Don't want to even "put it out there." It would be an absolute bombshell, if you understand what it is -- which I'm sure you will.
Look up the term "Fraud on the Court." Any misrepresentation of an officer of the court (all bar attorneys are officers of the court, even for cases in which they are not involved).
If Sullivan is setting a trap for DS lawyers to make material misrepresentations, this might apply. Could lead to disbarment of DS lawyers. Now, that would be an interesting twist. Not saying I think that is what's going on, but an interesting tangent to consider.
[–]23796395?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
All attorneys practice barratry and work for a foreign club (enemy combatant) when push comes to shove (they dance when their card gets pulled) - whether they are aware yet or not.
Every laymen needs to become a lawyer and attorneys should be the exception rather than the rule.
[–] 23794789? [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
KEK! Even better ... DOJ never provided any facts to present to the court (how Flynn's actions impacted any legal proceeding) for the court to rule on. Corrupt attorneys trying to thread the needle on that one should be glorious.
[–] 23794841? ago
Considering Flynn was actually a cooperating witness in the other FARA case, I agree, they would have nothing. The only other case that would apply, the fake investigation of Trump, is one they can't admit was actually open on the day of the interview.
[–] 23795082? [S] 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
You still around? I figured out how Sullivan MIGHT be wearing a white hat. Don't even want to post it as a new thread, on the off chance I'm right. Don't want to even "put it out there." It would be an absolute bombshell, if you understand what it is -- which I'm sure you will.
Look up the term "Fraud on the Court." Any misrepresentation of an officer of the court (all bar attorneys are officers of the court, even for cases in which they are not involved).
If Sullivan is setting a trap for DS lawyers to make material misrepresentations, this might apply. Could lead to disbarment of DS lawyers. Now, that would be an interesting twist. Not saying I think that is what's going on, but an interesting tangent to consider.