0
0

[–] nothinglasts4ever ago 

Right? WTF! That’s the first question I would have hanged that little bastard with.

0
0

[–] aicilla ago 

Exactly!!Not patents ,vitc,mabye i missed but I didn't hear him asked about PEPFAR.HIS many conflicts of interest.I really dont get why noone asks questions that matter

0
0

[–] SuckaFree ago 

This "hearing" was bunk and just for public show, nothing more. Can't even call it a hearing if no one is physically present.

0
0

[–] TXWYNMTX ago 

So is Falsey a Dr of medicine or a “scientist” as he says? As a “scientist”, is he open to all arguments or data judging them equally and siding with the conclusion or Reason for an outcome that most fits The observation?

0
0

[–] 4841400209 ago 

He claimed a couple of weeks ago the patents had to have a name on them, even though he was working at the NIH. Haven't checked it out, but sounds fishy to me.

0
0

[–] bruno196101 ago 

Their not going to neither! A lot of them are just as dirty as he is!

0
1

[–] noeffort 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

never practiced, beauracrat....

1
1

[–] usmcProud1183 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

And did anyone really think this was a boom week? This hearing is a bore and an absolute junk hearing... Look you few hundred voat folks Q said the house needs to bring Barr and Durahm in for hearings so we're still about 4-6 months out from anything boom like... It's like watching paint dry.. OMG though Q has posted 100's of posts and that's supposed to appease you...

1
0

[–] amarQ144 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

more like watching dry paint fade

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)