2020-04-22 | The Cold Calculations America’s Leaders Will Have to Make Before Reopening - The New York Times
'What if somebody in my family gets sick?'
'If the family member doesn’t need hospitalization and can be cared for at home, you should help him or her with basic needs and monitor the symptoms, while also keeping as much distance as possible, according to guidelines issued by the C.D.C. If there’s space, the sick family member should stay in a separate room and use a separate bathroom. '
'If masks are available, both the sick person and the caregiver should wear them when the caregiver enters the room. '
'Make sure not to share any dishes or other household items and to regularly clean surfaces like counters, doorknobs, toilets and tables. '
' Don’t forget to wash your hands frequently. '
Fuck Jew York Times
They are spreading fear for something that has a lethality rate of 1-3 percent ?
Then They want 100% testing 3 times a month ...
We gotta get rid of the Jews in government.
Look to the byzantine empire and the thousand years they flourished. What made it possible.
[–] 23528353? ago
As the joke goes: some of you may die, and that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make. - Regardless of party affiliation, of Prez, senator, state gov, these people come from the ruling class. A small group of people in socio-economic status who are accustomed to placing their own interests first.
[–] 23528492? [S] ago
True
[–] 23528772? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Answer the question. How many people dying in the US would be acceptable versus the amount of people losing their positions, companies, farms, retirement funding etc?
[–] 23534459? ago
Well, I'm taking a 30% hit on my retirement savings at the moment. Not happy about it. I'm kinda down on death panels. Whether in the present form: for-profit health care, or in the form of government groups that "decide." We come back to not numbers, tho, but who decides. Is it like what Stalin said about votes: it doesn't matter who votes; it matters who counts. Do we give the decision to people who have profited from the work of others. Or do we give it to the others? And how on earth do we make either of these ways work. - The big losers at the moment appear to be big companies that have responded, correctly, to the market and saved as close to nothing as possible. Small companies and small farms? That's laughable. We have displaced these for years in the interest of cheaper and cheaper. Smart management has sent skill overseas. What jobs we are protecting, and probably we need to do so, is the low-wage and short hours segment of the economy that lives from paycheck to paycheck. And without health care. In the end, we are going to discover that our economy was a hollow sham. Printing money to give to people is the path to inflation: lots of dollars without substance to back it up. - I'd say the way to research the die v jobs problem is to ask people. Find out who would be willing to lose children and relatives. Possibly many would. After all this was the way society worked for centuries. I'd like to think that we could provide both better care and better jobs. But I fear that we have let that slip by.