0
0

[–] Blood-is-Nature ago 

Nothing material about what I'm clinging to of the past

The "institution" was past to you through the material men: No direct line to the source, just a game of Chinese Whispers with a corruption rate of 99ish % or let's called it the manufacturing industry of the immaterial, which coincidentally is also the modus operandi of the parasites.

We agree the message was corrupted by satan.

If you create an immaterial analogy (an idol) out of something unmistakably going on in the material you obfuscate reality. That doesn't help anyone. So at the bank counter, when the slave signs his terms and conditions contract and reaches for the credit card; you jump out and scream "Satan did it". How does that help anyone? So NO; I don't agree at all with making secrets out of nature to deceive others.

We are being destroyed by our own free will.

No. By not owing up to the responsibilities attached to it. The terms and conditions of existence; made freely available through the instincts. You gotta listen tho.

The will He gave us that we can use to love Him, or hate Him. If we choose to hate Him? We will be destroyed.

I told you before; love and hate are not natural states. They are umbrella terms that hide a multitude of different natural processes as well endless dangerous contradictions and lies. Rhetorical traps aka weaponized language.

For people to drop their hatred, anger, and egos.

Impossible, because it's defined by the opposites. The positives and the negatives are tied together; they must coexist. You cannot separate them; you can only balance in between them.

pray every day that people use this time of quarantine to see how sick our world is.

You have the parasites to thank for this, because they are using their usurped power to write an enlightenment; revealing arc into history. From the Matrix to snowden, wikileaks, the fappening, the truther movement, google ngram viewer, Websters 1828 online dictionary, Q-anon, up to this pandemic lie...they want us to know.

world without end

Nope. Not as long as TIME defines all existence to be finite; to be moving from a beginning towards an end.

0
0

[–] Blood-is-Nature ago 

If associating "oneself" (that doesn't exist?) with one's consciousness is "bad", then who/what is shirking "responsibilities"?

It is negative, because you corrupt your own intent from the information you hold within (beliefs), instead of the changing information from the outside (reality). that corrupts your actions to create contradictions to reality, which you comprehend as such, because your beliefs restrict your comprehension, and then you make up excuses and justifications, which you don't even have to do yourself, because the parasites are littering your mind with it 24/7 in form of fear and contradictions. The shirking of responsibility part is based on you not owning up on self discernment. This is a hard pill to swallow, because while the world is corrupted against you by your fellow parasites, you can hardly blame the world at large for yourself not being able to discern what your place in existence is. That's what happens when you don't have strong unity that makes it easier for you to understand what's going on. Other lifeforms don't have this problem, because of their instinctive behavior and them actually listening to their senses. So when the fox comes out of the bush, the young deer doesn't go like "What's that? A fox. What does it do? It kills. What are we gonna do? We run. Ahhhhh", instead it senses danger, it perceives the fleeing movement of it's parents and the urgency behind it and it instinctively hightails the fuck out of there (at least in my version of this tale).

Agree completely. And the only way to do so is through Jesus. Through understanding Him, loving Him, and living for Him. Allowing Him into your heart to give you the strength and understanding you need to make the right choices to accomplish that goal.

Yet every other life-form manages to do that just fine without accepting that belief. I could slap Spongebob on that and claim that he's responsible for it all. What's the difference? The other life-forms would continue nonetheless. Yet from the perspective of someone who wants to control (claiming ownership over) others, this looks suspiciously like using deception to make them believe you, it entails just enough similarity to the laws of nature that one would fall for it. What would change is that you would then not be working for yourself, but for those who control you, who don't like unity to come for them and chop their heads off, which is why they corrupt and attack you from every possible direction. Now how does holding a belief helps anyone to adapt against that eventuality?

No, a lesser/non-rotting corpse is a sign of perfection. It's a shine of perfect harmony between the body and the world. A body that never rots is in perfect harmony with God (or you'd say "nature"), by definition, no? If it wasn't in perfect harmony, it would decay, yes?

What is this? Necrophilia? As a "scientist" you should comprehend the basis of alchemy...dissolving into the base, transmutation, order out of chaos, the circle of life and all that. Decay is in no way, shape or form a negative. It is the pass-over into something new. What you call perfection is what the parasites are up to...trying to stagnate change so that they can exploit the present longer. You are in direct violation with the circle of life when you mess with the pass-over process. Oh wait; the parasites got that covered under burial rites. Emptying out the fluids, harvesting the organs, stuffing the corpse with formaldehyde and trash, mocking life itself by masquerading death as it, then putting a box around it to prevent the decaying process for as long as possible. It's beyond disgusting that this is allowed to happen. The rejection of nature in that act is almost incomprehensible.

My joy is much more than a thought. I'm sorry if your joys are only thoughts.

An emotion is a thought until you act it out; then it becomes an action. If you holding it in; it corrupts into a temptation like lust.

When one realizes everyone is God's child, that we are all family, the will to disagree and to fight disappears.

Another ladle of cognitive dissonance to the infighting within Christianity. How is judeo-Christianity and Christian zionism doing these days? Catholicism is just friends among friends these days...I wouldn't even go so hard at this doctrine if it would actually deliver what it promised, but it's self delusion towards self destruction.

For we are called to love not just our neighbors, but our enemies.

Where is the balance in that? You acknowledge order and chaos but you don't comprehend that balance demands defense too. Between defense and offense; defense is the positive, so why don't you use it? Why don't you defend what you believe in against attacks? Defending doesn't mean going offensive; it just means defending at all costs. How can life reject survial?

To pray that they will come to Jesus and His loving arms.

Still with the conversion bullshit that destroyed so much, because you have no defense against lies. Proclaiming what is truth is not a defense against lies.

I've studied the evidence. Not only have I found them to be convincing

How many millions of the so called jews find the holocaust "evidence" extremely convincing after studying it? Have you seen the pile of shoes? How could anyone deny that (they can't; it's illegal)?. There are people working at NASA that believe we went to the moon. There are people outside your door right now who were fooled to believe that they have to distance themselves from their own species, because of deadly viruses.

Instead one must put their faith in the institution.

INSTITU'TION, noun [Latin institutio.] - Establishment; that which is appointed, prescribed or founded by authority, and intended to be permanent. Thus we speak of the institutions of Moses or Lycurgus. We apply the word institution to laws, rites, and ceremonies, which are enjoined by authority as permanent rules of conduct or of government.

Again; blind faith towards false authority to shirk your own responsibilities. If you take the deity (just happens to be unquestionable) out of equation you see the entire charade of selfish humans enslaving each other, yet you cling to the last thing that stands between you and facing the consequences of your actions, which just happens to be the ONE, which represents the opposite of the ALL (unity), as in; selfishness. Why does that make so much sense? Where does my comprehension play tricks on me?

One must have a relationship with the institution, so that one can be held accountable to the truth by the institution, and hold the institution accountable to the truth.

You never apply any of this to reality. You just hold it as a belief and hide behind it. Your relationship with the institution is mental and physical, but you ignore the physical in its entirety to the detriment of all. It's belief restricting comprehension to prevent action.

If one fails at this and begins to worship man?

You did this by breathing, by accepting life over death, by accepting the liberty of freedom of choice, which you used to then accept the authority of another afterwards, and now try to let the new authority claim ownership over that which came before. That is how they used the birth-certificate to legalize abortions, because the birth certificate negates the validity of the nine months since inception; it's how they created the corporate identity of our names in capital letters on the birth certificate, to negate our real life existence so that they can trick karmic justice for the crimes they commit against us. That is talmudic reasoning using contract law (birth certificate) to manipulate the terms and conditions, which later turned into legalized abortion (human blood sacrifice).

One. Thousands of manuscripts. One Gospel. All agree. Copied by numerous people in numerous countries across numerous time frames. All of which agree on the core doctrine. Not possible to fake. Not possible to corrupt by man, for the corruption would be obvious due to the fact that it spread far and wide, under control of no man, but under the control of God. Perfectly preserved for us to learn from and cherish, as it deserves.

So everything is perfect then? Christianity is the bees knees and reality just bites...while you find out the hard way how that will turn out; I stick to adaptation to ever changing circumstances like the squirrels in my yard. The parasites don't even have to try anymore; it's self perpetuation extinction.

defending their Heavenly Father

Against what? Certainly not against blasphemy, because that ship sunk a long time ago. If you could, would you be so nice to throw some scripture at me that deals with this whole self defense is bad dilemma? I need to get to the bottom of this. I need the line that managed to override human survial instinct. Why is the deity in any need of defense and why are believers encouraged to do so but not allowed to defend themselves?

That's why Christians must stand up against jews

No. Never against, but for yourself, which includes defense against. Between order and chaos you cannot go for chaos to create order, because you would step towards chaos and thereby create more of it. You entire intent is corrupted through the division that belief causes. Don't chase the pedophile; defend the child and you're free to do as you please to whomever tries to lay hands on her. That's the difference in how intent changes the outcome.

I'm putting faith based on knowledge and experience into the future

Knowledge and experience towards life after death in heaven...I caste doubt.

0
0

[–] zxcvbnasdf ago 

What is this? Necrophilia? As a "scientist" you should comprehend the basis of alchemy...dissolving into the base, transmutation, order out of chaos, the circle of life and all that. Decay is in no way, shape or form a negative. It is the pass-over into something new. What you call perfection is what the parasites are up to...trying to stagnate change so that they can exploit the present longer. You are in direct violation with the circle of life when you mess with the pass-over process. Oh wait; the parasites got that covered under burial rites. Emptying out the fluids, harvesting the organs, stuffing the corpse with formaldehyde and trash, mocking life itself by masquerading death as it, then putting a box around it to prevent the decaying process for as long as possible. It's beyond disgusting that this is allowed to happen. The rejection of nature in that act is almost incomprehensible.

The parasites are using science and sacrificing children to remain immortal. Jesus, Mary, and saints need no external inputs.

Your comparison is invalid, and demonstrates lack of understanding.

Another ladle of cognitive dissonance to the infighting within Christianity. How is judeo-Christianity and Christian zionism doing these days? Catholicism is just friends among friends these days...I wouldn't even go so hard at this doctrine if it would actually deliver what it promised, but it's self delusion towards self destruction.

A child sees a sandcastle and destroys it. Then the child wonders why the sandcastle doesn't exist.

Where is the balance in that? You acknowledge order and chaos but you don't comprehend that balance demands defense too. Between defense and offense; defense is the positive, so why don't you use it? Why don't you defend what you believe in against attacks? Defending doesn't mean going offensive; it just means defending at all costs. How can life reject survial?

I reject nothing you say. You lack understanding.

Loving your enemies does not mean not defending yourself against them. That is what parasites, and apparently you, want people to believe. It's false. It's a lie. It's mind control.

Loving your enemy means treating them with the respect they deserve. When they attack, you defend. But only to the degree necessary to ensure your safety. If that means killing them all? Then so be it. God will command that. If that means neutralizing them? Then so be it. If that means talking to them? Then so be it. If that means giving them charity? Then so be it.

Your strict adherence to your beliefs makes you blind to reality.

How many millions of the so called jews find the holocaust "evidence" extremely convincing after studying it?

None. Because they don't study it. They are indoctrinated into it.

You can't discern between intense study of all sides of an argument, and believing what you want to believe. That is a deadly lack of discernment.

Again; blind faith towards false authority to shirk your own responsibilities.

Repeating your belief that the authority is false does not come close to demonstrating what you're saying is anything more than what you believe. Especially when you refuse to demonstrate it. When your assurances do nothing to refute the point that the Church comes from God. And that God will not let His Church fall.

The fact that you keep talking about "blind faith" means you are not reading what I'm writing. That your beliefs are making it impossible for you to adapt.

You never apply any of this to reality.

Of course I do? How do you think I live my life? My beliefs make perfect sense of why I'm communicating with you. Why I'm giving you information you don't have.

You can adapt to new information, or you can not. The choice is yours.

You just hold it as a belief and hide behind it.

I've laid my beliefs here. To say I "hold it as a belief and hide behind it" ignores the fact that I've given reason and evidence for my beliefs. You've done nothing to refute the evidence, other than tell me your beliefs. I find your beliefs completely unconvincing. However I think you are striving for the truth, so I can understand you perfectly. It's unfortunate that you won't adapt to try to understand my beliefs to understand me perfectly. For if we understood each other perfectly, we would learn something. However I can't learn anything if you refuse to engage.

So everything is perfect then?

No, because creatures refuse to come to Him. As I've explained. Many times. Why do you keep asking the same question? Why are you not able to adapt to my answers?

Against what?

Earth is a battle ground between good and evil, as I said. So we are called to turn it wholly good by defending God. Not complicated.

Certainly not against blasphemy, because that ship sunk a long time ago.

Definitely against blasphemy.

If you could, would you be so nice to throw some scripture at me that deals with this whole self defense is bad dilemma? I need to get to the bottom of this. I need the line that managed to override human survial instinct. Why is the deity in any need of defense and why are believers encouraged to do so but not allowed to defend themselves?

Self defense isn't bad. Parasites who believe like you have hijacked the message of Christianity and have, through lies and deceit, convinced them that they are good and the Christians are evil. It is only possible because evil people who have no morals, and believe morals don't exist, and believe, as you, that truth doesn't exist that this can happen.

Your ideology is why this is happening.

Knowledge and experience towards life after death in heaven...I caste doubt.

It is available to you if you want it. But that choice is yours, not mine.

0
0

[–] Blood-is-Nature ago 

Earth is a battle ground between good and evil, as I said

Good and evil are not natural states. They only exist in your head. No other life form points a finger at something and proclaims it to be good or evil. Predator and prey are coexisting. Two humans can contradict the same object as good and evil. It's nothing but a false duality to keep your arguing the contradictions. Also, there is no battle going on, which would be a fight between opposing parties. Existence is a one way ticket towards an end. The conflict; the struggle is to maintain balance. All the conflicts that you're referring to are consequences of the former action of holding a belief, creating a contradiction and then opposing each other indefinitely.

So we are called to turn it wholly good by defending God.

Again throwing billions of lifeforms into the trash, because they neither can comprehend nor answer the "call". Anything non-human just happens to be here to accommodate us, because we are so worthy that a world was created for us. The defenders of god, the warriors of good against the evil corruption within ourselves. Master of all, in a fallen world that is nothing but a prop battleground that we let decay, while we uphold the honor of the unquestionable one, by putting faith towards the evil ones joining us so that we can all be happy after death in perfection without opposites. Mel Brooks could've wrote this.

Definitely against blasphemy.

The life of Mel Brooks; a life of blasphemy without any Christian resistance whatsoever. The talmud is legally protected now, while churches are not allowed to open their doors. Definitely not against blasphemy if you ask me. Also, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" was told to you by someone you accepted the authority of, thereby contradicting the law. Have you noticed that the talmud has a commandment before that? It's called "I am the Lord thy God". Do you see the difference when a believer receives the commandment "I am the Lord thy God" and he answers: "I am the Lord thy God" and both smile, shake their hands and subvert in unison? How can you ignore this? They make the spell so obvious.

And since you are so strong against blasphemy you should check out the commandments page on (((wikipedia))) that has the talmud before all others. It's called historical revisionism goes chutzpah, and it's legal under the smith-mundt act.

Parasites who believe like you have hijacked the message of Christianity and have, through lies and deceit, convinced them that they are good and the Christians are evil. It is only possible because evil people who have no morals, and believe morals don't exist, and believe, as you, that truth doesn't exist that this can happen.

No, it's not my fault for pointing out reality and I also don't leech upon anyone. What you ignore with every fiber of your body and mind is accepting change, because it leads towards death, which is the point where all the contradictions piling up against your beliefs will be washed aside by the truth of nature...the end; your end. What does it say about Christianity that it could've been hijacked by "evil" people with no morals? I also work hard every day to follow "morality" under the laws of nature by steering my actions towards positive consequences.

Your ideology is why this is happening.

So me explaining how this ecosystem works, while telling you to not believe it, but question it for yourself through adaptation is the fault for mankind destroying itself based on the contradicting beliefs they're holding? Ideology is btw a term coming directly from Karl Marx and Friederich Engels, but who knows where they stole it from. You didn't do yourself any favors by using marxist terms to put blame on me.

It is available to you if you want it.

See "wants" are temptations, and wants attached to a contract of belief with terms and conditions, is something I'm not willing to pay for.

0
0

[–] Blood-is-Nature ago 

The parasites are using science and sacrificing children to remain immortal.

So parasites are defined by their host, yet you want to fight them. Science curtails comprehension of reality, yet you participate in, give authority towards and believe in it. Sacrificing children manifests in the pro-life vs pro-choice abortion conflict, in which the majority of both sides have not a single clue of the sacrificial aspect celebrated by a (((3rd party))), and immortality just so happens to coincide with your faith in the afterlife, while the science you uphold cannot present evidence for immortality in the reality. That entire statement is a contradicting work of fiction. Prolonging life through blood consumption seems logical, but I need more than assumptions on that, so I stick with "lie until proven otherwise".

Jesus, Mary, and saints need no external inputs

Other than the unquestionable demand of belief that is.

A child sees a sandcastle and destroys it. Then the child wonders why the sandcastle doesn't exist.

For about three seconds then it adapts to whatever else more interesting happens around him. They don't hold on to the belief of the sandcastle's lost existence. It is us who educate them to do so, by instilling fear and shame. The child acted on natural instincts and the parents will shame him into compliance to their beliefs. The destroyed sandcastle just taught the child about change, and instead of directing it towards a positive (help rebuilding) it will most likely end with accusations and shame (a negative).

Loving your enemy means treating them with the respect they deserve. When they attack, you defend. But only to the degree necessary to ensure your safety. If that means killing them all? Then so be it. God will command that. If that means neutralizing them? Then so be it. If that means talking to them? Then so be it. If that means giving them charity? Then so be it.

Your strict adherence to your beliefs makes you blind to reality.

Where have those Christians you talk about been hiding for the last couple of thousands years? And if you blame corruption for it; tell me why they haven't defended themselves against the spread of it? The orthodoxy Christians I talk to this morning listened to the gospel and the only official recognition of reality was them wishing each other well in these troubling times. Then when the kids were finally allowed to participate in reality again; they ran out to catch up on life and it was me instigating discussions about positive and negate aspects of our surroundings; not the Presbyter standing next to me; making small talk. And those believers within my surroundings are influenced by me, so they are multiple levels elevated when it comes to comprehension and questioning their world. Their religious beliefs seldom come up, because I keep them busy in real life, in building communities, in maintaining order, in multiple forms of bartering, in generational exchange of knowledge, in all kinds of defenses etc. And I hold no authority position, because I don't accept any. I just make stuff work.

You are upholding a doctrine that is absent in reality. You either don't adapt to change or you ignore it on purpose.

None. Because they don't study it. They are indoctrinated into it.

You can't discern between intense study of all sides of an argument, and believing what you want to believe. That is a deadly lack of discernment.

Case and point; Owen Benjamin. A history major in WWII history, who spend a year or so living in the Czech Republic to study it, while interviewing "holocaust" survivor, visiting the places and who later hosted a science podcast at California Institute of Technology, where he interviewed all the big idols of science. That being said; thanks to him live-streaming daily for last couple of years, we learned that he believed every single thing he was involved in (including his successful Hollywood career) until he run into the moral contradiction of endorsing transsexual surgery for children. He rejected to do it; got kicked out of Hollywood, slandered, threatened, censored ever since, all his payment processors shut down, and he ever since shared with the world how he questioned each and every one of his beliefs to show the lie behind it. He had so many epiphanies on stream that's it's psychological case study by itself to watch his transformation into father of three, farm-steading, truth speaking, community building....devout Christian. He kicked the hornets nest of the holocaust hard and is mocking them ever since.

So there you go...cult of personality surrounding his persona aside, there is your studying towards self indoctrination to lies example, that only broke thanks to a traumatic trigger (the trans child abuse issue). And just to rub it in; he's still holding to Christianity like you. He tackled his indoctrinated lack of discernment; live on stream for all the world to see, and he faced up to being wrong over and over again. Then again; don't believe it; I don't.

Repeating your belief that the authority is false...

You are the only authority over your actions, which makes any other authority false by default including those you believe in. You are in contract to nature, which exchanges the liberty of freedom of choice for the judgments upon the consequences of your actions.

When your assurances do nothing to refute the point that the Church comes from God. And that God will not let His Church fall.

How many churches fell before because the deity was forgotten? "But that's different, because my deity is the only ONE..." says every believer ever until someone chops his heads of and proclaims yet again "there can only be ONE", and then the credits of Highlander roll and a so called jew makes bank yet again. How could I refute something that you base on an unquestionable belief you yourself are holding? I proved that holding a belief is a temptation leading towards death by pointing out that it's the opposite of adaptation, which is the demand for survial in a constantly changing system. A religion can be nothing but a lie on a foundation like that.

The fact that you keep talking about "blind faith" means you are not reading what I'm writing.

Blind faith is holding onto a belief. Blind faith against constant change in exchange for restriction of comprehension towards assumptions. I don't believe in anything; I adapt to everything.

That your beliefs are making it impossible for you to adapt.

Accepting a restriction (someone else's belief) is not adaptation. You proclaim your belief, which is why you create conflict. I just talk about it without any commitment to it. I claim nothing. I don't have to claim the laws of nature, because they define this ecosystem. They gave you the liberty of freedom of choice to even hold a belief. Before you could even comprehend anything; right at inception, you already fell under the laws of nature, because your beginning defined your end; defined your existence as the struggle in between. Years of your life spend without any belief in religious doctrines and once you fell under it's spell, you have the audacity to just slap it onto the years without your belief, and even onto the entire past in which you didn't existed. You slap it on every other lifeforms, which can't even comprehended the concept of it, you slap in on all of those who rejected, you slap it on those who believe in something entirely different, and you slap even on those who don't care at all. You justify all of this unfathomable selfishness with the belief you're holding within yourself. You even recognize that this world is run by liars, which by definition means that you agree that a lie requires a believer to work. And yet, here you are, blaming everyone else, but yourself. How is it me not using adaption, when refusing to believe what you believe; especially as I stated multiple times that I don't hold beliefs. And not just religious beliefs, but no -isms or any other beliefs, because that would be selfish to restrict myself to what I tell myself. That would be like watching a lion run towards me, while holding to the belief that everything is a-OK. It would be self destructive. Imagine I train with weapons and hold the unquestionable belief that I can do certain maneuvers and then I hit myself while doing it. What am I gonna do then? Ignore what happened, make a religion out of it to use the followers to justify my actions, contradict reality by telling myself it didn't happen?

Of course I do? How do you think I live my life? My beliefs make perfect sense of why I'm communicating with you.

Look at the state of the world around you and tell me how 99% of conscious humans could've been enslaved by 1% of liars? If you are in the 99% then your beliefs are nothing but the justification of ignorance to reality.

Why I'm giving you information you don't have.

Like what? Quoting scripture to me that you didn't wrote? Parroting the work of others, while using it to justify your assumptions against me? Don't you think I have scriptures here? Don't you realize that all I said comes directly from me (Minus the Owen Benjamin anecdote)? I don't quote anyone; I even state that you shouldn't believe me, but question yourself.

0
0

[–] Blood-is-Nature ago 

To be clear, I don't fear death at all. I have had experiences in this life, personal experiences, that make me more scared of life than death, in a lot of ways.

Your belief represents that which might be over that which is. You sacrifice the present existence for what you believe comes after death. You can bury your own intent behind this as much as you want; but agreeing to survial under nature by breathing, while holding onto a contradictory belief, is you subconsciously seeking for a substitute for death, which is the origin of all fears.

How do you know that's all I am? Have you seen energy? Is it something science tells you? Something your religion tells you? I mean I agree with your concept, it's just a bit distorted.

When I say energy I mean the core material all existence is based upon; the one we all share; the one we all are "shaped" out of. Why would you think you can claim to be more than what the core energy allows you to be?

So can I have free access to your body? What controls my access to your body if not you? Does nature? If I'm an apex predator, does that mean nature has dictated I have free access to your body? Why not?

Through the blood yes; it's called breeding; the mixing of blood, but the body is just the vessel for the life essence, which is the only thing that can pass on through the bloodline. What you refer to is mind swap; that's science fiction, but there is the ability to tab into the same mass consciousness together, so telepathy (for lack of words) is logically possible, just likely not in our recent predicament of self deception.

What negative consequences is there to me hurting you? Or raping a woman? It's just adaptation right? It's just a belief that raping is wrong, so surely a negative consequence of that belief is that I don't rape? Rape is found all over in nature, so nature does not forbid it right?

Nothing wrong with raping or killing or any other action. Remember that nature gave us the liberty of freedom of choice, so there is no morality attached to any action we could act out. What decides the consequences, which nature passes judgment upon, is our intent, which is where morality based on the natural order comes to play. If you rape a female to create new life, it will have positive consequences; new life, but if you rape for lust, you corrupt yourself into a criminal rapist. As you observe from that situation your intent only influences YOUR actions, and the female you just raped with good intentions may not share the same intent, hence the bloody marks on your chest. This is why you have common sense to pre-judge the consequences of your actions, which is a necessary moral compass if you share a system among other conscious life, because you cannot control them; only try to predict how they might react. That's where chance likes to pop up and say hello, and it also teaches the necessity of unity ; of working together.

The problem with your emotional line of thinking stems from the corrupt laws of men who gave you an ongoing massive list of contradicting do's and dont's to control you. These rules indoctrinate you towards the behavior of passing judgment upon others, which is by design to create more division. When you pass judgment onto others you will then shirk it do those you put the blind faith of authority towards so that they can pass down "justice" so that you feel better about yourself. This is why the media shoves crimes in your face all the time, so that you become judgmental and dependent on their control grid, and of course fear-porn, because nothing yields more energy to harvest than fear, hence the recent pandemic situation (Event 201 - A Global Pandemic Exercise).

I agree with this completely, and it makes perfect sense on Christianity. God sent the Holy Spirit to dwell within us to give us access to morality. God gave us free will to make free choices. That will allows us to choose to be moral or not. Over time, our will is corrupted and we choose to succumb to weakness, and sin against God, which has many negative consequences. The further we get away from God, the further we fall. And time is the cruelest way to be separated from God, for we begin navel gazing and forget who He is. Begin to believe we're gods and that we can do what we want.

So you use a complex analogy that hides reality by taking our roles in all of this out of the picture. Now apply this concept to hundreds of millions of believers, who are not as capable to comprehend reality as we are, and you could see how this would cause a whole lot of harm and create a whole lot of opportunity for parasites to exploit it. If you utilize language to make nature more complex; you are operating within a negative action the second you proclaim it.

Is it part of nature or not? If it is, what part of nature are you? If it's not, where does it exist?

The human identity carrier is the life essence within the blood. The consciousness is "just" a tool for comprehension of reality. It receives information from the outside (router), it utilizes the memory bank of the brain (ram), it works in unity with the ecosystem that is your body (the PC)...it is the operating system, but electricity is the life essence that runs it all. What's missing is the guy sitting in front of the PC making the input, we don't have that. The inner dialog is the communication within a closed system; it's the sum of all things within our ecosystem (body). Again; the ALL; not the ONE, but we fell for the selfishness of the ONE by believing ourselves.

The consciousness is not it's own existence; it's a material function within our vessel and it will die with it; only the blood will move on (if you did your job as placeholder in between the bloodlines by procreating). The inner dialog; the communication within our system is what corrupted us to believe that we are the consciousness. We are not; we are within the blood; it combines the past, the present and the future. Comprehension is just a temporary gift; proven by the lowering of perception based on time; change.

I agree. I believe I've done that through prayer. I believe God has shown me things that are so beautiful they have brought me to tears. Not convincing for you, but very impactful for me. Especially when they come as I ask them. Especially when they show me the beauty of perfection.

It's self delusion. I did it many times through meditation in motion. It feeds from my beliefs, fears and emotions to deliver wants (temptations) to me. The more beliefs I kicked off, the more it helped me focus on thinking, but it doesn't have the same effect as me learning from adaptation (like what I'm doing right now thanks to your inspiration). So again nature taught me the importance of unity over selfishness; which is why I advice against mediation as THE WAY, the Buddhists would call it. They seek clarity in the ONE (themselves) instead of the ALL (unity), which is against because of holding beliefs that restrict their comprehension. Yes you can power through mediation, prayer and even drugs to "elevate" your mind, but it will never come close to that which you receive from unity, which is nature making sure we work together as the sum of all things.

If everything is free, then what are "responsibilities"? How do we have "responsibilities"?

Again you signed to contract of responsibility with your first breath; you accepted life over death, which created the first natural law "opposites must coexist, because they're defined by each other, as well as the 2nd "all actions have consequences" and the 3rd "morality" with it. At that point it's about you lacking self discernment, because your parents teaching you lies and subverting your instincts, based on thousands of years of attacks against the family unit. If you had self discernment, you would learn quickly that procreation is the only means to overcome death, and that "creation in accordance to the laws of nature and for the benefit of all (unity)" is the only way to create the best possible breeding ground fro your offspring, which translates to maintenance, which in combination with your sophisticated comprehension ability and your apex position would fit perfectly into the position of a steward to this ecosystem. It all comes together if we would just let comprehension let loose and adapt accordingly to change. Take our level of comprehension out of the picture and down to instincts and compare it to all other life and you see how they all follow the same laws of nature, without the mental baggage we made up in our minds, and it would turn out fine for them without us playing destroyer of worlds.